[PATCH 0/3] mm: optimize thp for reclaim and migration
From: Yu Zhao
Date: Sat Jul 31 2021 - 02:39:47 EST
Systems using /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled=always can
experience memory pressure due to internal fragmentation from a large
number of thp. Userspace can leave many subpages untouched but reclaim
can't identify them based on the dirty bit (and drop them like what it
does to clean pages).
However, it's still possible to know whether a subpage is equivalent
to being clean by checking its content. When splitting a thp for
reclaim or migration, we can drop subpages that contain only zeros
and therefore avoid writing them back or duplicating them.
benchmark
=========
The best case scenario is only the first byte of head is non zero.
The worse case scenario is only the last byte of every subpage is non
zero.
zram 10GB
~~~~~~~~~
best case 7.170s 3.559s -50.36%
worst case 8.216s 8.94s +8.81%
swap 10GB
~~~~~~~~~
best case 70.466s 3.544s -94.97%
worst case 67.014s 65.521s -2.22% (noise)
(CONFIG_THP_SWAP=n)
zram (before)
=============
best case
~~~~~~~~~
time 7.170s
21.78% clear_page_erms
16.47% zram_bvec_rw
2.90% clear_huge_page
2.74% _raw_spin_lock
2.65% page_vma_mapped_walk
2.41% flush_tlb_func
2.21% shrink_page_list
1.55% try_to_unmap_one
1.29% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.25% page_counter_cancel
1.21% __mod_node_page_state
1.17% __mod_lruvec_page_state
1.10% add_to_swap_cache
1.08% xas_create
1.07% xas_store
worst case
~~~~~~~~~~
time 8.216s
17.27% clear_page_erms
13.25% lzo1x_1_do_compress
4.35% zram_bvec_rw
3.41% memset_erms
3.23% _raw_spin_lock
2.88% page_vma_mapped_walk
2.75% clear_huge_page
2.28% flush_tlb_func
1.92% shrink_page_list
1.39% try_to_unmap_one
1.21% page_counter_cancel
1.20% zs_free
1.14% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.13% xas_create
1.02% __mod_lruvec_page_state
zram (after)
============
best case
~~~~~~~~~
time 3.559s
44.55% clear_page_erms
27.74% memchr_inv
6.43% clear_huge_page
2.71% split_huge_page_to_list
1.79% page_vma_mapped_walk
1.31% __split_huge_pmd
1.21% remove_migration_pte
1.12% __free_one_page
worst case
~~~~~~~~~~
time 8.94s
16.08% clear_page_erms
11.81% memchr_inv
9.62% lzo1x_1_do_compress
3.51% memset_erms
3.17% zram_bvec_rw
2.76% _raw_spin_lock
2.70% clear_huge_page
2.34% flush_tlb_func
2.25% page_vma_mapped_walk
1.56% shrink_page_list
1.33% try_to_unmap_one
1.07% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.04% xas_create
1.01% zs_free
disk (before)
============
best case
~~~~~~~~~
time 70.466s
23.38% clear_page_erms
3.91% clear_huge_page
3.32% _raw_spin_lock
2.95% page_vma_mapped_walk
2.43% shrink_page_list
2.25% flush_tlb_func
1.84% try_to_unmap_one
1.53% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.45% __mod_memcg_lruvec_state
1.37% page_counter_cancel
1.17% _raw_spin_lock_irq
1.16% xas_create
1.12% _find_next_bit
1.11% xas_store
1.11% add_to_swap_cache
1.10% __mod_node_page_state
1.04% __mod_lruvec_page_state
1.04% __free_one_page
worst case
~~~~~~~~~~
time 67.014s
25.54% clear_page_erms
4.36% clear_huge_page
3.51% _raw_spin_lock
2.97% page_vma_mapped_walk
2.85% flush_tlb_func
1.84% try_to_unmap_one
1.52% shrink_page_list
1.47% __mod_memcg_lruvec_state
1.42% page_counter_cancel
1.38% _raw_spin_lock_irq
1.28% __mod_lruvec_page_state
1.15% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.13% xas_load
1.10% add_to_swap_cache
1.05% __mod_node_page_state
disk (after)
============
best case
~~~~~~~~~
time 3.544s
42.58% clear_page_erms
27.44% memchr_inv
6.15% clear_huge_page
2.60% split_huge_page_to_list
1.74% page_vma_mapped_walk
1.26% __free_one_page
1.11% remove_migration_pte
1.10% __split_huge_pmd
1.08% __list_del_entry_valid
worst case
~~~~~~~~~~
time 65.521s
21.83% clear_page_erms
14.39% memchr_inv
3.66% clear_huge_page
3.17% _raw_spin_lock
2.38% page_vma_mapped_walk
2.32% flush_tlb_func
1.59% try_to_unmap_one
1.39% shrink_page_list
1.26% page_counter_cancel
1.16% __mod_memcg_lruvec_state
1.11% add_to_swap_cache
1.05% _raw_spin_lock_irq
test.c
======
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define handle_error(msg) \
do { perror(msg); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } while (0)
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *addr;
size_t size;
int offset, num_dirty;
int ret;
if (argc != 4) {
printf("Usage: ./a.out SIZE OFFSET NUM_DIRTY\n"
"SIZE: Size of mmap region in MB\n"
"OFFSET: Offset of (first) dirty byte in each 4KB page, 0 ~ 4095\n"
"NUM_DIRTY: Number of dirty 4KB pages in each 2MB region, 0 ~ 512\n");
return -1;
}
size = (size_t)(((size_t)atoi(argv[1])) << 20);
offset = atoi(argv[2]);
num_dirty = atoi(argv[3]);
addr = (char *)mmap(NULL, size , PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FAILED)
handle_error("mmap");
ret = madvise(addr, size, MADV_HUGEPAGE);
if (ret == -1)
handle_error("mmap hugepage");
for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i += (1 << 21))
for (size_t j = 0; j < (num_dirty << 12); j += (1 << 12))
memset(addr + i + j + offset, 0xff, 1);
ret = madvise(addr, size, MADV_PAGEOUT);
if (ret == -1)
handle_error("mmap pageout");
ret = munmap(addr, size);
if (ret == -1)
handle_error("munmap");
return 0;
}
Yu Zhao (3):
mm: don't take lru lock when splitting isolated thp
mm: free zapped tail pages when splitting isolated thp
mm: don't remap clean subpages when splitting isolated thp
include/linux/rmap.h | 2 +-
include/linux/vm_event_item.h | 2 ++
mm/huge_memory.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
mm/migrate.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/vmstat.c | 2 ++
5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0.554.ge1b32706d8-goog