Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] soundwire/ASoC: abstract platform-dependent bases

[Vinod Koul]

On 28-07-21, 00:38, Liao, Bard wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 12:12 AM
> > To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx; vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx; pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kale,
> > Sanyog R <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>; Liao, Bard <bard.liao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] soundwire/ASoC: abstract platform-dependent
> > bases
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 07:54:45PM +0800, Bard Liao wrote:
> > > shim base and alh base are platform-dependent. This series suggests to
> > > use variables for those bases. It allows us to use different bases for
> > > new platforms.
> > 
> > The ASoC bits look fine to me, what't eh plan for merging this?  I can apply to
> > ASoC if people like, or should the Soundwire bits go via the Soundwire tree?

I have acked the sdw parts, pls pick them thru ASoC tree. If we have
conflicts, I can merge the immutable tag from your tree.

> Thanks Mark. Apply to ASoC or Soundwire are both fine to me.

-- 
~Vinod