Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Enhancements
From: Anshuman Khandual
Date: Mon Aug 02 2021 - 00:52:51 EST
On 8/2/21 5:39 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
>
> On 7/29/21 5:14 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 7/27/21 11:43 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> There are couple of issues with current implementations and this series
>>> tries to resolve the issues:
>>>
>>> (a) All needed information are scattered in variables, passed to various
>>> test functions. The code is organized in pretty much relaxed fashion.
>>>
>>> (b) The page isn't allocated from buddy during page table entry modifying
>>> tests. The page can be invalid, conflicting to the implementations
>>> of set_xxx_at() on ARM64. The target page is accessed so that the iCache
>>> can be flushed when execution permission is given on ARM64. Besides,
>>> the target page can be unmapped and access to it causes kernel crash.
>>>
>>> "struct pgtable_debug_args" is introduced to address issue (a). For issue
>>> (b), the used page is allocated from buddy in page table entry modifying
>>> tests. The corresponding tets will be skipped if we fail to allocate the
>>> (huge) page. For other test cases, the original page around to kernel
>>> symbol (@start_kernel) is still used.
>>>
>>> The patches are organized as below. PATCH[2-10] could be combined to one
>>> patch, but it will make the review harder:
>>>
>>> PATCH[1] introduces "struct pgtable_debug_args" as place holder of all
>>> needed information. With it, the old and new implementation
>>> can coexist.
>>> PATCH[2-10] uses "struct pgtable_debug_args" in various test functions.
>>> PATCH[11] removes the unused code for old implementation.
>>> PATCH[12] fixes the issue of corrupted page flag for ARM64
>>>
>>> Changelog
>>> =========
>>> v4:
>>> * Determine the page allocation method according to
>>> MAX_ORDER (Anshuman)
>>> * Move existing comments to init_args() (Anshuman)
>>> * Code refactoring as suggested by Anshuman (Anshuman)
>>> * Improved commit log and add comments for flush_dcache_page()
>>> in PATCH[v4 12/12] (Anshuman)
>>> * Address misc comments (Anshuman
>>
>> This series builds ok on all supported platforms but should also be tested
>> on them as well i.e s390, ppc, arc and riscv. I was able to do some tests
>> on arm64 and x86 platforms.
>>
>
> I had tests on the platforms except arc as it's not supported by QEMU yet.
> The test is pretty simple to boot the kernel and see if there is any warning
> raised from mm/debug_vm_pgtable. Everything looks good.
Sure, that should be enough.
>
> The test was done on v5, which will be posted pretty soon. Thanks again for
> your continuous review.
Please also do copy Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> for ARC in the next version.
- Anshuman