Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: tn48m: Add support for Delta TN4810M CPLD
From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Mon Aug 02 2021 - 08:12:39 EST
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 2:10 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 12:17 AM Robert Marko <robert.marko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Delta TN4810M uses a similar CPLD GPIO expander
> > like the TN48M, but it has pins for 48 SFP+ ports,
> > making a total of 192 pins.
> > It also provides the TX fault pins which the TN48M
> > does not.
> >
> > Only TX disable pins like on the TN48M are output
> > ones.
> >
> > Thankfully, regmap GPIO allows for the driver to be
> > easily extended to support the TN4810M.
> >
> > Note that this patch depends on the following series:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-gpio/list/?series=247538
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c
> > index b12a6b4bc4b3..e429e7ade941 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tn48m.c
> > @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ enum tn48m_gpio_type {
> > TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE = 1,
> > TN48M_SFP_PRESENT,
> > TN48M_SFP_LOS,
> > + TN4810M_SFP_TX_DISABLE,
> > + TN4810M_SFP_TX_FAULT,
> > + TN4810M_SFP_PRESENT,
> > + TN4810M_SFP_LOS,
> > };
> >
> > static int tn48m_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -46,17 +50,36 @@ static int tn48m_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > config.regmap = regmap;
> > config.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > - config.ngpio = 4;
> > + config.ngpio_per_reg = 8;
> >
> > switch (type) {
> > case TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE:
> > config.reg_set_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 4;
> > break;
> > case TN48M_SFP_PRESENT:
> > config.reg_dat_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 4;
> > break;
> > case TN48M_SFP_LOS:
> > config.reg_dat_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 4;
> > + break;
> > + case TN4810M_SFP_TX_DISABLE:
> > + config.reg_set_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 48;
> > + break;
> > + case TN4810M_SFP_TX_FAULT:
> > + config.reg_dat_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 48;
> > + break;
> > + case TN4810M_SFP_PRESENT:
> > + config.reg_dat_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 48;
> > + break;
> > + case TN4810M_SFP_LOS:
> > + config.reg_dat_base = base;
> > + config.ngpio = 48;
> > break;
> > default:
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unknown type %d\n", type);
> > @@ -67,9 +90,34 @@ static int tn48m_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id tn48m_gpio_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-tx-disable", .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE },
> > - { .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-present", .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_PRESENT },
> > - { .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-los", .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_LOS },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-tx-disable",
> > + .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_TX_DISABLE
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-present",
> > + .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_PRESENT
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn48m-gpio-sfp-los",
> > + .data = (void *)TN48M_SFP_LOS
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-tx-disable",
> > + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_TX_DISABLE
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-tx-fault",
> > + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_TX_FAULT
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-present",
> > + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_PRESENT
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "delta,tn4810m-gpio-sfp-los",
> > + .data = (void *)TN4810M_SFP_LOS
> > + },
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tn48m_gpio_of_match);
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
>
> This looks good to me. I suppose the other patches are going in
> through the MFD tree. I don't see anything that can fail here at
> build-time - can you confirm that I can pick these patches up
> separately for v5.15?
>
> Bartosz
Scratch that, I now saw Linus' comment about the special purpose pins
under the other series. Let's clear that up first.
Bart