Re: [PATCH 07/13] HV/Vmbus: Add SNP support for VMbus channel initiate message

[Joerg Roedel]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:52:22AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> +	if (hv_is_isolation_supported()) {
> +		vmbus_connection.monitor_pages_va[0]
> +			= vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[0];
> +		vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[0]
> +			= memremap(msg->monitor_page1, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
> +				   MEMREMAP_WB);
> +		if (!vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[0])
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		vmbus_connection.monitor_pages_va[1]
> +			= vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[1];
> +		vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[1]
> +			= memremap(msg->monitor_page2, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
> +				   MEMREMAP_WB);
> +		if (!vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[1]) {
> +			memunmap(vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[0]);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +
> +		memset(vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[0], 0x00,
> +		       HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE);
> +		memset(vmbus_connection.monitor_pages[1], 0x00,
> +		       HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE);
> +	}

Okay, let me see if I got this right. In Hyper-V Isolation VMs, when the
guest wants to make memory shared, it does":

	- Call to the Hypervisor the mark the pages shared. The
	  Hypervisor will do the RMP update and remap the pages at
	  (VTOM + pa)

	- The guest maps the memory again into its page-table, so that
	  the entries point to the correct GPA (which is above VTOM
	  now).

Or in other words, Hyper-V implements a hardware-independent and
configurable c-bit position, as the VTOM value is always power-of-two
aligned. Is that correct?
This would at least explain why there is no separate
allocation/dealloction of memory for the shared range.

Thanks,

	Joerg