On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 09:10:26 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PING!As far as I'm concerned, we can move forward with this. Was this
This patch will pre-req version 17 of a patch series I have waiting in
the wings,
so I'd like to get this one merged ASAP. In particular, if a KVM
maintainer can
take a look at the comments concerning the taking of the kvm->lock
before the
matrix_mdev->lock it would be greatly appreciated. Those comments begin with
Message ID <20210727004329.3bcc7d4f.pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Halil Pasic.
supposed to go in via Alex's tree?
On 7/19/21 3:35 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
This series is actually only comprised of a single patch to replace the
open coded locks used during VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM notification. The
first patch is included because it is a pre-req slotted to be merged but is
not yet available in the kernel.
Tony Krowiak (2):
s390/vfio-ap: r/w lock for PQAP interception handler function pointer
s390/vfio-ap: replace open coded locks for VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
notification
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +-
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 28 +++++-
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 10 +-
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 127 +++++++++-----------------
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 4 +-
5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)