Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW

[Viresh Kumar]

On 30-07-21, 00:08, Hector Yuan wrote:
> From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add devicetree bindings for MediaTek HW driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml      |   70 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6bb2c97
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek-hw.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek's CPUFREQ Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Hector Yuan <hector.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description:
> +  CPUFREQ HW is a hardware engine used by MediaTek
> +  SoCs to manage frequency in hardware. It is capable of controlling frequency
> +  for multiple clusters.
> +

Should this somewhere have a reference to
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dvfs/performance-domain.yaml ?

> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: mediatek,cpufreq-hw
> +
> +  reg:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 2
> +    description: |
> +      Addresses and sizes for the memory of the
> +      HW bases in each frequency domain.
> +
> +  "#performance-domain-cells":
> +    description:
> +      Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Typically 1 for nodes
> +      providing multiple performance domains (e.g. performance controllers),
> +      but can be any value as specified by device tree binding documentation
> +      of particular provider.

You say this can have any value, 1 or more, but then ...

> +    const: 1

You fix it to 1 ?

Perhaps you should add a reference to the performance-domain.yaml here
as well, and say const 1 here and describe how the parameter is going
to be used. You should only explain it in respect to your SoC.

But I am not that good with Yaml stuff, I will let Rob correct me here
:)

-- 
viresh