Re: [PATCH net v2 1/1] net: dsa: qca: ar9331: make proper initial port defaults
From: Oleksij Rempel
Date: Tue Aug 03 2021 - 05:54:30 EST
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:06:05PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 10:53:20AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Make sure that all external port are actually isolated from each other,
> > so no packets are leaked.
> >
> > Fixes: ec6698c272de ("net: dsa: add support for Atheros AR9331 built-in switch")
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > changes v2:
> > - do not enable address learning by default
> >
> > drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
> > index 6686192e1883..de7c06b6c85f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
> > @@ -101,6 +101,46 @@
> > AR9331_SW_PORT_STATUS_RX_FLOW_EN | AR9331_SW_PORT_STATUS_TX_FLOW_EN | \
> > AR9331_SW_PORT_STATUS_SPEED_M)
> >
> > +#define AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_CTRL(_port) (0x104 + (_port) * 0x100)
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_ING_MIRROR_EN BIT(17)
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_LOCK_DROP_EN BIT(5)
>
> not used
ack, will remove
>
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE GENMASK(2, 0)
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_DISABLED 0
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_BLOCKING 1
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_LISTENING 2
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_LEARNING 3
> > +#define AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_FORWARD 4
....
> >
> > -static int ar9331_sw_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> > +static int ar9331_sw_setup_port(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> > {
> > struct ar9331_sw_priv *priv = (struct ar9331_sw_priv *)ds->priv;
> > struct regmap *regmap = priv->regmap;
> > + u32 port_mask, port_ctrl, val;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + /* Generate default port settings */
> > + port_ctrl = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE,
> > + AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_DISABLED);
>
> PORT_STATE_DISABLED? why? Can you ping over any interface after applying
> this patch?
grr... good point. My fault, sorry.
> > +
> > + if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port)) {
> > + /* CPU port should be allowed to communicate with all user
> > + * ports.
> > + */
> > + port_mask = dsa_user_ports(ds);
> > + /* Enable Atheros header on CPU port. This will allow us
> > + * communicate with each port separately
> > + */
> > + port_ctrl |= AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_HEAD_EN;
> > + } else if (dsa_is_user_port(ds, port)) {
> > + /* User ports should communicate only with the CPU port.
> > + */
> > + port_mask = BIT(dsa_to_port(ds, port)->cpu_dp->index);
>
> You can use "port_mask = BIT(dsa_upstream_port(ds, port));", looks nicer
> at least to me.
ok.
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |