On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:55 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:34:02 PDT (-0700), geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:14 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:44 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
>> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
>> > > @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ / {
>> > > model = "Microchip MPFS Icicle Kit";
>> > > compatible = "microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit";
>> > >
>> > > + aliases {
>> > > + ethernet0 = &emac1;
>> > > + };
>> > > +
>> > > chosen {
>> > > };
>> >
>> > This should be added to the board DTS (microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts)
>> > instead.
>>
>> I was wondering the same thing before doing this, but when I checked
>> all other DTS in arch/riscv/boot I found the aliases node is put in
>> the SoC dtsi file instead of the board on so I think that's the
>> convention.
>
> The numbering of the aliases is supposed to match the labels on the
> board, hence it is board-specific, not SoC-specific.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
I don't see a v2 of this.
Will send v2 soon.