Re: [PATCH V2 03/14] x86/set_memory: Add x86_set_memory_enc static call support

[Dave Hansen]

On 8/5/21 7:23 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is assuming any of this is actually performance critical, based off
> of this using static_call() to begin with.

This code is not performance critical.

I think I sent folks off on a wild goose chase when I asked that we make
an effort to optimize code that does:

	if (some_hyperv_check())
		foo();

	if (some_amd_feature_check())
		bar();

with checks that will actually compile away when Hyper-V or
some_amd_feature() is disabled.  That's less about performance and just
about good hygiene.  I *wanted* to see
cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE...) checks.

Someone suggested using static calls, and off we went...

Could we please just use cpu_feature_enabled()?