[PATCH v4 26/35] mm, slub: only disable irq with spin_lock in __unfreeze_partials()
From: Vlastimil Babka
Date: Thu Aug 05 2021 - 11:25:25 EST
__unfreeze_partials() no longer needs to have irqs disabled, except for making
the spin_lock operations irq-safe, so convert the spin_locks operations and
remove the separate irq handling.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index c8637150bf28..b8581a9b58cc 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2335,9 +2335,7 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *partial_page)
{
struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL, *n2 = NULL;
struct page *page, *discard_page = NULL;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
while (partial_page) {
struct page new;
@@ -2349,10 +2347,10 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *partial_page)
n2 = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
if (n != n2) {
if (n)
- spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
n = n2;
- spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
}
do {
@@ -2381,9 +2379,7 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *partial_page)
}
if (n)
- spin_unlock(&n->list_lock);
-
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
while (discard_page) {
page = discard_page;
--
2.32.0