Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Handle missing FW variant

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Lee Jones (2021-08-05 01:00:09)
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 9:47 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > >
> > > > There was an "unknown" firmware variant turning up in the wild
> > > > causing problems in the clock driver. Add this missing variant
> > > > and clarify that varian 11 and 15 are Samsung variants, as this
> > > > is now very well known from released products.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: phone-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Clock maintainers: could you please ACK this so Lee can take
> > > > this into the MFD tree? The chances of merge collisions are
> > > > zero, this code changes very seldom.
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_of_clk.c | 3 ++-
> > >
> > > >  drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c       | 6 ++++--
> > > >  include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h | 3 ++-
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Actually I intended for the clock people to ACK it for you
> > but since it is completely independent of 1/2 it actually works
> > either way, maybe they will rather pick it up, who knows? :D
> 
> That's fine too.
> 
> I assume they will not require an immutable branch, as the turn-over
> in this file is very low.
> 

Seems fine to go through mfd. Isn't there some other ux500 patch on the
list though?