Re: [PATCH] media: hantro: Fix check for single irq

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On Fri, 2021-08-06 at 06:44 +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Dne petek, 06. avgust 2021 ob 00:03:36 CEST je Ezequiel Garcia napisal(a):
> > Hi Jernej,
> > 
> > On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 21:04 +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > > Some cores use only one interrupt and in such case interrupt name in DT
> > > is not needed. Driver supposedly accounted that, but due to the wrong
> > > field check it never worked. Fix that.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 18d6c8b7b4c9 ("media: hantro: add fallback handling for single
> > > irq/clk") Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c index
> > > 8a2edd67f2c6..20e508158871 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c
> > > @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static int hantro_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >                 if (!vpu->variant->irqs[i].handler)
> > >                         continue;
> > >  
> > > -               if (vpu->variant->num_clocks > 1) {
> > > +               if (vpu->variant->num_irqs > 1) {
> > 
> > Oops, thanks for spotting this.
> > 
> > How about this instead?
> 
> No, original solution is more robust. With solution below, you're assuming 
> that irq order in driver array is same as in DT. That doesn't matter if there 
> is only one name or if names match. However, if there is a typo, either in DT 
> node or in driver, driver will still happily assign clock based on index and 
> that might not be correct one. Even if it works out, you can easily miss that 
> you have a typo. Driver doesn't tell you which irq is used, if it is 
> successfully acquired.
> 

I find it odd to iterate up to num_irqs but then
have a case for num_irqs == 1, and call
platform_get_irq(vpu->pdev, 0).

But OTOH, your fix is correct and it's a oneliner.

Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Ezequiel