Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Make MAX_ORDER adjustable as a kernel boot time parameter.
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Mon Aug 09 2021 - 07:24:00 EST
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 09:29:29PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > I am, however, of the opinion that 2MB pages give us so much trouble
> > because they're so very special. Few people exercise those code paths and
> > it's easy to break them without noticing. This is partly why I want to
> > do arbitrary-order pages. If everybody is running with compound pages
> > all the time, we'll see the corner cases often, and people other than
> > Hugh, Kirill and Mike will be able to work on them.
>
> I don't entirely agree. I'm all for your use of compound pages in page
> cache, but don't think its problems are representative of the problems
> in aiming for a PMD (or PUD) bar, with the weird page table transitions
> we expect of "THP" there.
>
> I haven't checked: is your use of compound pages in page cache still
> limited to the HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE architectures? When
> the others could just as well use compound pages in page cache too.
It is no longer gated by whether TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is enabled or not.
That's a relatively recent change, and I can't say that I've tested it.
I'll give it a try today on a PA-RISC system I've booted recently.
One of the followup pieces of work that I hope somebody other than
myself will undertake is using 64KB PTEs on a 4KB PAGE_SIZE ARM/POWER
machine if the stars align.