Re: [PATCH v28 06/32] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:51:53PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> +DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +
> +	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> +		pr_emerg("PANIC: unexpected kernel control protection fault\n");

No need for that call...

> +		die("kernel control protection fault", regs, error_code);

... as this one can say "unexpected" in the string too.

> +		panic("Machine halted.");
> +	}
> +
> +	cond_local_irq_enable(regs);
> +
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))

cpu_feature_enabled()

> +		WARN_ONCE(1, "Control protection fault with CET support disabled\n");
> +
> +	tsk = current;
> +	tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
> +	tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_CP;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ratelimit to prevent log spamming.
> +	 */
> +	if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, SIGSEGV) &&
> +	    __ratelimit(&cpf_rate)) {
> +		unsigned long ssp;
> +		int cpf_type;
> +
> +		cpf_type = array_index_nospec(error_code, ARRAY_SIZE(control_protection_err));
> +
> +		rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
> +		pr_emerg("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx ssp:%lx error:%lx(%s)",
> +			 tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
> +			 regs->ip, regs->sp, ssp, error_code,
> +			 control_protection_err[cpf_type]);
> +		print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", regs->ip);
> +		pr_cont("\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, (void __user *)0);
> +	cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static bool do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	int res;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> index 5a3c221f4c9d..a1a153ea3cc3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
>  #define SEGV_ADIPERR	7	/* Precise MCD exception */
>  #define SEGV_MTEAERR	8	/* Asynchronous ARM MTE error */
>  #define SEGV_MTESERR	9	/* Synchronous ARM MTE exception */
> -#define NSIGSEGV	9
> +#define SEGV_CPERR	10	/* Control protection fault */
> +#define NSIGSEGV	10
>  
>  /*
>   * SIGBUS si_codes
> -- 

Was there a manpage patch for the user-visible bits?

I seem to remember something flying by very vaguely ...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette