Re: [PATCH 08/13] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Work around broken CVAL implementations
From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Tue Aug 10 2021 - 09:15:07 EST
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:34:07 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:26:46PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > The Applied Micro XGene-1 SoC has a busted implementation of the
> > CVAL register: it looks like it is based on TVAL instead of the
> > other way around. The net effect of this implementation blunder
> > is that the maximum deadline you can program in the timer is
> > 32bit wide.
> >
> > Detect the problematic case and limit the timer to 32bit deltas.
> > Note that we don't tie this bug to XGene specifically, as it may
> > also catch similar defects on other high-quality implementations.
>
> Do we know of any other implementations that have a similar bug?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > index 895844c33351..1c596cd3cc5c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> > @@ -778,9 +778,42 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys_mem(unsigned long evt,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static u64 __arch_timer_check_delta(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> > + u64 tmp;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * XGene-1 implements CVAL in terms of TVAL, meaning that the
> > + * maximum timer range is 32bit. Shame on them. Detect the
> > + * issue by setting a timer to now+(1<<32), which will
> > + * immediately fire on the duff CPU.
> > + */
> > + write_sysreg(0, cntv_ctl_el0);
> > + isb();
> > + tmp = read_sysreg(cntvct_el0) | BIT(32);
> > + write_sysreg(tmp, cntv_cval_el0);
>
> This will fire on legitimate implementations fairly often. Consider if
> we enter this function at a time where CNTCVT_EL0[32] == 1, where:
>
> * At 100MHz, bit 32 flips every ~42.95
> * At 200MHz, bit 32 flips every ~21.47
> * At 1GHz, bit 32 flips every ~4.29s
>
> ... and ThunderX2 has a 200MHz frequency today, with SBSA recommending
> 100MHz.
Yup, you're right, this is silly. Orr-ing the bit is a bad enough bug
(it really should be a +), but also preemption in a guest will add
another set of false positives.
> What does XGene-1 return upon a read of CVAL? If it always returns 0 for
> the high bits, we could do a timing-insensitive check for truncation of
> CVAL, e.g.
>
> | /* CVAL must be at least 56 bits wide, as with CNT */
> | u64 mask = GENMASK(55, 0);
> | u64 val;
> |
> | write_sysreg(mask, cntv_cval_el0);
> | val = read_sysread(cnt_cval_el0);
> |
> | if (val != mask) {
> | /* What a great CPU */
> | }
No, the register itself returns what has been written. But only the
low 32bits of the delta trickle into TVAL on write, which is then used
as a countdown. I guess I could play the same trick as above with a
higher bit, but it still is pretty unreliable, as it could then wrap
through 0.
Maybe I'll just check the MIDR in the end...
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.