Re: [patch] x86/pat: pass correct address to sanitize_phys
From: Jeff Moyer
Date: Tue Aug 10 2021 - 15:21:02 EST
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jeff,
>
> On Wed, Jul 21 2021 at 15:48, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> Please write function names with brackets, i.e. sanitize_phys().
OK, will do.
>> memtype_reserve takes an address range of the form [start, end). It
>
> [start, end]
Start is inclusive, end is exclusive, so start <= x < end. I used the
notation found here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_(mathematics)
If that's too confusing, I can stick to inclusive vs exclusive verbiage.
>> then passes the start and end addresses to sanitize_phys, which is meant
>> to operate on the inclusive addresses. If end falls at the end of the
>> physical address space, sanitize_phys will return 0. This can result in
>> drivers failing to load:
>>
>> [ 10.000087] mpt3sas_cm0: unable to map adapter memory! or resource not found
>> [ 10.000334] mpt3sas_cm0: failure at drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c:10597/_scsih_probe()!
>
> Doesn't this trigger the WARN() right below that offending line?
It does. I'll include the warning message in the v2 posting.
>> Fix this by passing the inclusive end address to sanitize_phys.
>>
>> Fixes: 510ee090abc3 ("x86/mm/pat: Prepare {reserve, free}_memtype() for "decoy" addresses")
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> --
>> It might be worth adding a comment, here. If there are any suggestions
>> on what a sane wording would be, I'm all ears.
>
> See below.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
>> index 3112ca7786ed..482557905294 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
>> @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ int memtype_reserve(u64 start, u64 end, enum page_cache_mode req_type,
>> int err = 0;
>>
>> start = sanitize_phys(start);
>> - end = sanitize_phys(end);
>
> /*
> * [start, end] is an exclusive address range, but
> * sanitize_phys() expects an inclusive end address
> */
That works for me (modulo the interval notation), thanks for the
suggestion.
Thanks!
Jeff