On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:09:00PM +0800, tangbin wrote:
On 2021/8/11 19:58, Mark Brown wrote:I see why it is redundant, I don't see what problem this redudnancy
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:55:23PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote:I think it's unnecessary, because we all know than the probe function is
The function stm32_spdifrx_parse_of() is only called by the functionWhat is the benefit of not doing the check? It seems like reasonable
stm32_spdifrx_probe(), and the probe function is only called with
an openfirmware platform device. Therefore there is no need to check
the device_node in probe function.
defensive programming.
only trigger if
the device and the driver matches, and the trigger mode is just Device Tree.
So the device_node
must be exist in the probe function if it works. That's the reason why I
think it's redundant.
causes.