Re: [PATCH v5, 13/15] dt-bindings: media: mtk-vcodec: Adds decoder dt-bindings for mt8192

From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Wed Aug 11 2021 - 13:59:39 EST

Hi Yunfei,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:57:59AM +0800, Yunfei Dong wrote:
> Adds decoder dt-bindings for mt8192.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v5: no changes
>
> This patch depends on "Mediatek MT8192 clock support"[1].
>
> The definition of decoder clocks are in mt8192-clk.h, need to include them in case of build fail [1].
>
> [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=511175
> ---
> .../media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml | 172 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..083c89933917
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iommu/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Mediatek Video Decode Accelerator With Component
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |+
> + Mediatek Video Decode is the video decode hardware present in Mediatek
> + SoCs which supports high resolution decoding functionalities. Required
> + master and component node.

This should explain how the three IP cores relate to each other.

> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec # for lat hardware
> + - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat # for core hardware
> + - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 5
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: vdec-sel
> + - const: vdec-soc-vdec
> + - const: vdec-soc-lat
> + - const: vdec-vdec
> + - const: vdec-top
> +
> + assigned-clocks: true
> +
> + assigned-clock-parents: true
> +
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + iommus:
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 32
> + description: |
> + List of the hardware port in respective IOMMU block for current Socs.
> + Refer to bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml.
> +
> + dma-ranges:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: |
> + Describes the physical address space of IOMMU maps to memory.
> +
> + mediatek,scp:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + Describes point to scp.
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - iommus
> + - dma-ranges
> +
> +allOf:
> + - if: #master node
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec # for lat hardware
> +
> + then:
> + required:
> + - mediatek,scp
> +
> + - if: #component node
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat # for core hardware
> + - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core
> +
> + then:
> + required:
> + - interrupts
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - assigned-clocks
> + - assigned-clock-parents
> + - power-domains
> +
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/memory/mt8192-larb-port.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h>
> +
> + vcodec_dec: vcodec_dec@16000000 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec";
> + reg = <0 0x16000000 0 0x1000>; /* VDEC_SYS */
> + mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
> + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_MC_EXT>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>;
> + };
> +
> + vcodec_lat: vcodec_lat@0x16010000 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat";
> + reg = <0 0x16010000 0 0x800>; /* VDEC_MISC */
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 426 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_VLD_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_VLD2_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_AVC_MV_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_PRED_RD_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_TILE_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_WDMA_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_RG_CTRL_DMA_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_UFO_ENC_EXT>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>;
> + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>,
> + <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_VDEC>,
> + <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_LAT>,
> + <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_LARB1>,
> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> + clock-names = "vdec-sel", "vdec-soc-vdec", "vdec-soc-lat",
> + "vdec-vdec", "vdec-top";
> + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC>;
> + };
> +
> + vcodec_core: vcodec_core@0x16025000 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core";
> + reg = <0 0x16025000 0 0x1000>; /* VDEC_CORE_MISC */
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 425 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> + iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_MC_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_UFO_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PP_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PRED_RD_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PRED_WR_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PPWRAP_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_TILE_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_VLD_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_VLD2_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_AVC_MV_EXT>,
> + <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_RG_CTRL_DMA_EXT>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>;
> + clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>,
> + <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_VDEC>,
> + <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_LAT>,
> + <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_LARB1>,
> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> + clock-names = "vdec-sel", "vdec-soc-vdec", "vdec-soc-lat",
> + "vdec-vdec", "vdec-top";
> + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> + power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC2>;
> + };

I'm a bit late in the game, reviewing v5 only, but I'm wondering if
those IP cores need to be modelled in separate nodes. It would be much
easier, from a software point of view, to have a single node, with
multiple register ranges.

Are some of those IP cores used in different SoCs, combined in different
ways, that make a modular design better ?

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart