Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (pmbus/bpa-rs600) Remove duplicate defininitions

From: Chris Packham
Date: Wed Aug 11 2021 - 17:58:17 EST



On 12/08/21 7:53 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:17:37PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
>> Commit 787c095edaa9 ("hwmon: (pmbus/core) Add support for rated
>> attributes") added definitions for MFR_VIN_MIN etc so we can remove the
>> local definitions of these from the bpa-rs600 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/pmbus/bpa-rs600.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/bpa-rs600.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/bpa-rs600.c
>> index d205b41540ce..d495faa89799 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/bpa-rs600.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/bpa-rs600.c
>> @@ -12,15 +12,6 @@
>> #include <linux/pmbus.h>
>> #include "pmbus.h"
>>
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_VIN_MIN 0xa0
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_VIN_MAX 0xa1
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_IIN_MAX 0xa2
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_PIN_MAX 0xa3
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_VOUT_MIN 0xa4
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_VOUT_MAX 0xa5
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_IOUT_MAX 0xa6
>> -#define BPARS600_MFR_POUT_MAX 0xa7
>> -
>> enum chips { bpa_rs600, bpd_rs600 };
>>
>> static int bpa_rs600_read_byte_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg)
>> @@ -83,28 +74,28 @@ static int bpa_rs600_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int pha
>>
>> switch (reg) {
>> case PMBUS_VIN_UV_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_VIN_MIN);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_VIN_MIN);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_VIN_OV_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_VIN_MAX);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_VIN_MAX);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_VOUT_UV_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_VOUT_MIN);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_VOUT_MIN);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_VOUT_OV_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_VOUT_MAX);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_VOUT_MAX);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_IIN_OC_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_IIN_MAX);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_IIN_MAX);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_IOUT_OC_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_IOUT_MAX);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_IOUT_MAX);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_PIN_OP_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_PIN_MAX);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_PIN_MAX);
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_POUT_OP_WARN_LIMIT:
>> - ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, BPARS600_MFR_POUT_MAX);
>> + ret = pmbus_read_word_data(client, 0, 0xff, PMBUS_MFR_POUT_MAX);
> If the above is correct, the driver reports the wrong attributes. For example,
> PMBUS_MFR_PIN_MAX is supposed to report the rated limit, not the warning limit.
> What does the datasheet say ?

The datasheet doesn't list PMBUS_VIN_UV_WARN_LIMIT etc at all. It does
say that MFR_VIN_xxx is the "rated" value but in my testing this also
appears that this is the same threshold at which the ALERT pin is asserted.

When I did the initial implementation I decided to map the WARN_LIMITs
to what I thought were reasonable manufacturer specific equivalents.
This also means that the thresholds can be displayed by existing
userspace tools that consume the sysfs ABI.

> Guenter
>
>> break;
>> case PMBUS_VIN_UV_FAULT_LIMIT:
>> case PMBUS_VIN_OV_FAULT_LIMIT:
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>