[ipmi:for-next 1/2] drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:689:5: error: expected ')'

From: kernel test robot
Date: Thu Aug 12 2021 - 15:09:06 EST

Next message: Rob Clark: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement bridge->mode_valid()"
Previous message: madvenka: "[RFC PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

tree: https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi for-next
head: f68d16759343cdbe44de07b9569b0b992291d13c
commit: 8365203515c64c9f7c11d14cdcccdac58c793598 [1/2] ipmi: rate limit ipmi smi_event failure message
config: hexagon-randconfig-r031-20210811 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi/commit/8365203515c64c9f7c11d14cdcccdac58c793598
git remote add ipmi https://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi
git fetch --no-tags ipmi for-next
git checkout 8365203515c64c9f7c11d14cdcccdac58c793598
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:689:5: error: expected ')'
msg[2]);
^
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c:686:4: note: to match this '('
dev_warn_ratelimited(smi_info->io.dev,
^
include/linux/dev_printk.h:188:24: note: expanded from macro 'dev_warn_ratelimited'
dev_level_ratelimited(dev_warn, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^
1 error generated.

vim +689 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c

536
537 static void handle_transaction_done(struct smi_info *smi_info)
538 {
539 struct ipmi_smi_msg *msg;
540
541 debug_timestamp("Done");
542 switch (smi_info->si_state) {
543 case SI_NORMAL:
544 if (!smi_info->curr_msg)
545 break;
546
547 smi_info->curr_msg->rsp_size
548 = smi_info->handlers->get_result(
549 smi_info->si_sm,
550 smi_info->curr_msg->rsp,
551 IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH);
552
553 /*
554 * Do this here becase deliver_recv_msg() releases the
555 * lock, and a new message can be put in during the
556 * time the lock is released.
557 */
558 msg = smi_info->curr_msg;
559 smi_info->curr_msg = NULL;
560 deliver_recv_msg(smi_info, msg);
561 break;
562
563 case SI_GETTING_FLAGS:
564 {
565 unsigned char msg[4];
566 unsigned int len;
567
568 /* We got the flags from the SMI, now handle them. */
569 len = smi_info->handlers->get_result(smi_info->si_sm, msg, 4);
570 if (msg[2] != 0) {
571 /* Error fetching flags, just give up for now. */
572 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
573 } else if (len < 4) {
574 /*
575 * Hmm, no flags. That's technically illegal, but
576 * don't use uninitialized data.
577 */
578 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
579 } else {
580 smi_info->msg_flags = msg[3];
581 handle_flags(smi_info);
582 }
583 break;
584 }
585
586 case SI_CLEARING_FLAGS:
587 {
588 unsigned char msg[3];
589
590 /* We cleared the flags. */
591 smi_info->handlers->get_result(smi_info->si_sm, msg, 3);
592 if (msg[2] != 0) {
593 /* Error clearing flags */
594 dev_warn_ratelimited(smi_info->io.dev,
595 "Error clearing flags: %2.2x\n", msg[2]);
596 }
597 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
598 break;
599 }
600
601 case SI_GETTING_EVENTS:
602 {
603 smi_info->curr_msg->rsp_size
604 = smi_info->handlers->get_result(
605 smi_info->si_sm,
606 smi_info->curr_msg->rsp,
607 IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH);
608
609 /*
610 * Do this here becase deliver_recv_msg() releases the
611 * lock, and a new message can be put in during the
612 * time the lock is released.
613 */
614 msg = smi_info->curr_msg;
615 smi_info->curr_msg = NULL;
616 if (msg->rsp[2] != 0) {
617 /* Error getting event, probably done. */
618 msg->done(msg);
619
620 /* Take off the event flag. */
621 smi_info->msg_flags &= ~EVENT_MSG_BUFFER_FULL;
622 handle_flags(smi_info);
623 } else {
624 smi_inc_stat(smi_info, events);
625
626 /*
627 * Do this before we deliver the message
628 * because delivering the message releases the
629 * lock and something else can mess with the
630 * state.
631 */
632 handle_flags(smi_info);
633
634 deliver_recv_msg(smi_info, msg);
635 }
636 break;
637 }
638
639 case SI_GETTING_MESSAGES:
640 {
641 smi_info->curr_msg->rsp_size
642 = smi_info->handlers->get_result(
643 smi_info->si_sm,
644 smi_info->curr_msg->rsp,
645 IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH);
646
647 /*
648 * Do this here becase deliver_recv_msg() releases the
649 * lock, and a new message can be put in during the
650 * time the lock is released.
651 */
652 msg = smi_info->curr_msg;
653 smi_info->curr_msg = NULL;
654 if (msg->rsp[2] != 0) {
655 /* Error getting event, probably done. */
656 msg->done(msg);
657
658 /* Take off the msg flag. */
659 smi_info->msg_flags &= ~RECEIVE_MSG_AVAIL;
660 handle_flags(smi_info);
661 } else {
662 smi_inc_stat(smi_info, incoming_messages);
663
664 /*
665 * Do this before we deliver the message
666 * because delivering the message releases the
667 * lock and something else can mess with the
668 * state.
669 */
670 handle_flags(smi_info);
671
672 deliver_recv_msg(smi_info, msg);
673 }
674 break;
675 }
676
677 case SI_CHECKING_ENABLES:
678 {
679 unsigned char msg[4];
680 u8 enables;
681 bool irq_on;
682
683 /* We got the flags from the SMI, now handle them. */
684 smi_info->handlers->get_result(smi_info->si_sm, msg, 4);
685 if (msg[2] != 0) {
686 dev_warn_ratelimited(smi_info->io.dev,
687 "Couldn't get irq info: %x,\n"
688 "Maybe ok, but ipmi might run very slowly.\n"
> 689 msg[2]);
690 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
691 break;
692 }
693 enables = current_global_enables(smi_info, 0, &irq_on);
694 if (smi_info->io.si_type == SI_BT)
695 /* BT has its own interrupt enable bit. */
696 check_bt_irq(smi_info, irq_on);
697 if (enables != (msg[3] & GLOBAL_ENABLES_MASK)) {
698 /* Enables are not correct, fix them. */
699 msg[0] = (IPMI_NETFN_APP_REQUEST << 2);
700 msg[1] = IPMI_SET_BMC_GLOBAL_ENABLES_CMD;
701 msg[2] = enables | (msg[3] & ~GLOBAL_ENABLES_MASK);
702 smi_info->handlers->start_transaction(
703 smi_info->si_sm, msg, 3);
704 smi_info->si_state = SI_SETTING_ENABLES;
705 } else if (smi_info->supports_event_msg_buff) {
706 smi_info->curr_msg = ipmi_alloc_smi_msg();
707 if (!smi_info->curr_msg) {
708 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
709 break;
710 }
711 start_getting_events(smi_info);
712 } else {
713 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
714 }
715 break;
716 }
717
718 case SI_SETTING_ENABLES:
719 {
720 unsigned char msg[4];
721
722 smi_info->handlers->get_result(smi_info->si_sm, msg, 4);
723 if (msg[2] != 0)
724 dev_warn_ratelimited(smi_info->io.dev,
725 "Could not set the global enables: 0x%x.\n",
726 msg[2]);
727
728 if (smi_info->supports_event_msg_buff) {
729 smi_info->curr_msg = ipmi_alloc_smi_msg();
730 if (!smi_info->curr_msg) {
731 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
732 break;
733 }
734 start_getting_events(smi_info);
735 } else {
736 smi_info->si_state = SI_NORMAL;
737 }
738 break;
739 }
740 }
741 }
742

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip

Next message: Rob Clark: "Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement bridge->mode_valid()"
Previous message: madvenka: "[RFC PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]