RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a-rdb: Add dts file to choose swp5 as dsa master

From: Hongbo Wang
Date: Fri Aug 13 2021 - 09:57:00 EST



> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:01:55AM +0800, hongbo.wang@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: hongbo wang <hongbo.wang@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > some use cases want to use swp4-eno2 link as ordinary data path, so we
> > can enable swp5 as dsa master, the data from kernel can be transmitted
> > to eno3, then send to swp5 via internal link, switch will forward it
> > to swp0-3.
> >
> > the data to kernel will come from swp0-3, and received by kernel via
> > swp5-eno3 link.
>
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a88396c137a1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb-dsa-swp5-eno3.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > +/*
> > + * Device Tree file for NXP LS1028A RDB with dsa master swp5-eno3.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright 2018-2021 NXP
> > + *
> > + * Hongbo Wang <hongbo.wang@xxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +#include "fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts"
>
> You will end up with two DT blobs with the same top level compatible. This is
> going to cause confusion. I suggest you add an additional top level compatible
> to make it clear this differs from the compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-rdb",
> "fsl,ls1028a" blob.
>
> Andrew

hi Andrew,

thanks for comments.

this "fsl-ls1028a-rdb-dsa-swp5-eno3.dts" is also for fsl-ls1028a-rdb platform,
the only difference with "fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts" is that it use swp5 as dsa master, not swp4,
and it's based on "fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts", so I choose this manner,
if "fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts" has some modification for new version, this file don't need be changed.

thanks,
hongbo