Re: [PATCH 10/64] lib80211: Use struct_group() for memcpy() region

[Kees Cook]

On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:04:09AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-07-27 at 13:58 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > 
> > +++ b/include/linux/ieee80211.h
> > @@ -297,9 +297,11 @@ static inline u16 ieee80211_sn_sub(u16 sn1, u16 sn2)
> >  struct ieee80211_hdr {
> >  	__le16 frame_control;
> >  	__le16 duration_id;
> > -	u8 addr1[ETH_ALEN];
> > -	u8 addr2[ETH_ALEN];
> > -	u8 addr3[ETH_ALEN];
> > +	struct_group(addrs,
> > +		u8 addr1[ETH_ALEN];
> > +		u8 addr2[ETH_ALEN];
> > +		u8 addr3[ETH_ALEN];
> > +	);
> >  	__le16 seq_ctrl;
> >  	u8 addr4[ETH_ALEN];
> >  } __packed __aligned(2);
> 
> This file isn't really just lib80211, it's also used by everyone else
> for 802.11, but I guess that's OK - after all, this doesn't really
> result in any changes here.
> 
> > +++ b/net/wireless/lib80211_crypt_ccmp.c
> > @@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ static int ccmp_init_iv_and_aad(const struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> >  	pos = (u8 *) hdr;
> >  	aad[0] = pos[0] & 0x8f;
> >  	aad[1] = pos[1] & 0xc7;
> > -	memcpy(aad + 2, hdr->addr1, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(hdr->addrs) != 3 * ETH_ALEN);
> > +	memcpy(aad + 2, &hdr->addrs, ETH_ALEN);
> 
> 
> However, how is it you don't need the same change in net/mac80211/wpa.c?
> 
> We have three similar instances:
> 
>         /* AAD (extra authenticate-only data) / masked 802.11 header
>          * FC | A1 | A2 | A3 | SC | [A4] | [QC] */
>         put_unaligned_be16(len_a, &aad[0]);
>         put_unaligned(mask_fc, (__le16 *)&aad[2]);
>         memcpy(&aad[4], &hdr->addr1, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
> 
> 
> and
> 
>         memcpy(&aad[4], &hdr->addr1, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
> 
> and
> 
>         memcpy(aad + 2, &hdr->addr1, 3 * ETH_ALEN);
> 
> so those should also be changed, it seems?

Ah! Yes, thanks for pointing this out. During earlier development I split
the "cross-field write" changes from the "cross-field read" changes, and
it looks like I missed moving lib80211_crypt_ccmp.c into that portion of
the series (which I haven't posted nor finished -- it's lower priority
than fixing the cross-field writes).

> In which case I'd probably prefer to do this separately from the staging
> drivers ...

Agreed. Sorry for the noise on that part. I will double-check the other
patches.

-- 
Kees Cook