Re: [PATCH v14 050/138] mm/workingset: Convert workingset_activation to take a folio

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:51:57PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >  /*
> > - * page_memcg_rcu - locklessly get the memory cgroup associated with a page
> > - * @page: a pointer to the page struct
> > + * folio_memcg_rcu - Locklessly get the memory cgroup associated with a folio.
> > + * @folio: Pointer to the folio.
> >   *
> > - * Returns a pointer to the memory cgroup associated with the page,
> > - * or NULL. This function assumes that the page is known to have a
> > + * Returns a pointer to the memory cgroup associated with the folio,
> > + * or NULL. This function assumes that the folio is known to have a
> >   * proper memory cgroup pointer. It's not safe to call this function
> > - * against some type of pages, e.g. slab pages or ex-slab pages.
> > + * against some type of folios, e.g. slab folios or ex-slab folios.
> 
> Maybe
> 
> - * Returns a pointer to the memory cgroup associated with the page,
> - * or NULL. This function assumes that the page is known to have a
> + * This function assumes that the folio is known to have a
>   * proper memory cgroup pointer. It's not safe to call this function
> - * against some type of pages, e.g. slab pages or ex-slab pages.
> + * against some type of folios, e.g. slab folios or ex-slab folios.
> + *
> + * Return: a pointer to the memory cgroup associated with the folio,
> + * or NULL.

I substantially included this change a few days ago and forgot to reply
to this email; sorry.  It now reads:

/**
 * folio_memcg_rcu - Locklessly get the memory cgroup associated with a folio.
 * @folio: Pointer to the folio.
 *
 * This function assumes that the folio is known to have a
 * proper memory cgroup pointer. It's not safe to call this function
 * against some type of folios, e.g. slab folios or ex-slab folios.
 *
 * Return: A pointer to the memory cgroup associated with the folio,
 * or NULL.
 */