Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kprobes: Bugfix and improvements

[Punit Agrawal]

Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Punit,
>
> Thanks for resending this series.
>
> Ingo, could you pick this patch too?
> I'll resend my series on this series.

I couldn't find the patches on any of the branches in tip - have they
been queued?

Please let me know if there anything else I need to do in order for them
to be picked up.

Thanks,
Punit

>
> Thank you,
>
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:34:21 +0900
> Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> This is the second posting of patches previously posted at
>> [0]. Although the patches were reviewed / acked in the previous cycle
>> but for some didn't end up getting picked up for this cycle.
>> 
>> This posting rebases the patches to 5.14-rc3 and makes some minor
>> improvements to the commit log in Patch 1. I've also added the tags as
>> appropriate from the previous posting.
>> 
>> It would be great if the patches can be picked up this time around.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Punit
>> 
>> 
>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/20210609105019.3626677-1-punitagrawal@xxxxxxxxx/
>> 
>> Punit Agrawal (5):
>>   kprobes: Do not use local variable when creating debugfs file
>>   kprobes: Use helper to parse boolean input from userspace
>>   kprobe: Simplify prepare_kprobe() by dropping redundant version
>>   csky: ftrace: Drop duplicate implementation of
>>     arch_check_ftrace_location()
>>   kprobes: Make arch_check_ftrace_location static
>> 
>>  arch/csky/kernel/probes/ftrace.c |  7 ----
>>  include/linux/kprobes.h          |  7 ++--
>>  kernel/kprobes.c                 | 58 ++++++++++----------------------
>>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> 2.30.2
>>