[PATCH] btrfs: fix a potential double put bug and some related use-after-free bugs
From: Wentao_Liang
Date: Wed Aug 18 2021 - 05:35:33 EST
In line 2955 (#1), "btrfs_put_block_group(cache);" drops the reference to
cache and may cause the cache to be released. However, in line 3014, the
cache is dropped again by the same put function (#4). Double putting the
cache can lead to an incorrect reference count.
Furthermore, according to the definition of btrfs_put_block_group() in fs/
btrfs/block-group.c, if the reference count of the cache is one at the
first put, it will be freed by kfree(). Using it again may result in the
use-after-free flaw. In fact, after the first put (line 2955), the cache
is also accessed in a few places (#2, #3), e.g., lines 2967, 2973, 2974,
….
We believe that the first put of the cache is unnecessary (#1).
We can fix the above bugs by removing the redundant
"btrfs_put_block_group(cache);" in line 2955 (#1).
2951 if (!list_empty(&cache->io_list)) {
...
2955 btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
//#1 the first drop to cache (unnecessary)
...
2957 }
...
2967 cache_save_setup(cache, trans, path); //#2 use the cache
...
2972 //#3 use the cache several times
2973 if (!ret && cache->disk_cache_state == BTRFS_DC_SETUP) {
2974 cache->io_ctl.inode = NULL;
2975 ret = btrfs_write_out_cache(trans, cache, path);
2976 if (ret == 0 && cache->io_ctl.inode) {
2977 num_started++;
2978 should_put = 0;
2979 list_add_tail(&cache->io_list, io);
2980 } else {
...
2985 ret = 0;
2986 }
2987 }
2988 if (!ret) {
2989 ret = update_block_group_item(trans, path, cache);
...
3003 if (ret == -ENOENT) {
...
3006 ret = update_block_group_item(trans, path, cache);
3007 }
...
3010 }
3011
...
3013 if (should_put)
3014 btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
//#4 the second drop to cache
Signed-off-by: Wentao_Liang <Wentao_Liang_g@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 9e7d9d0c763d..c510c821b1be 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -2953,7 +2953,6 @@ int btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
list_del_init(&cache->io_list);
btrfs_wait_cache_io(trans, cache, path);
- btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
}
--
2.25.1