RE: [PATCH V3 13/13] HV/Storvsc: Add Isolation VM support for storvsc driver

[Michael Kelley]

From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 8:20 AM
> 
> On 8/20/2021 2:17 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 10:56 AM
> >
> > I'm not clear on why payload->range.offset needs to be set again.
> > Even after the dma mapping is done, doesn't the offset in the first
> > page have to be the same?  If it wasn't the same, Hyper-V wouldn't
> > be able to process the PFN list correctly.  In fact, couldn't the above
> > code just always set offset_in_hvpg = 0?
> 
> The offset will be changed. The swiotlb bounce buffer is allocated with
> IO_TLB_SIZE(2K) as unit. So the offset here may be changed.
> 

We need to prevent the offset from changing.  The storvsc driver passes
just a PFN list to Hyper-V, plus an overall starting offset and length.  Unlike
the netvsc driver, each entry in the PFN list does *not* have its own offset
and length.  Hyper-V assumes that the list is "dense" and that there are
no holes (i.e., unused memory areas).

For example, consider an original buffer passed into storvsc_queuecommand()
of 8 Kbytes, but aligned with 1 Kbytes at the end of the first page, then
4 Kbytes in the second page, and 3 Kbytes in the beginning of the third page.
The offset of that first 1 Kbytes has to remain as 3 Kbytes.  If bounce buffering
moves it to a different offset, there's no way to tell Hyper-V to ignore the
remaining bytes in the first page (at least not without using a different
method to communicate with Hyper-V).   In such a case, the wrong
data will get transferred.  Presumably the easier solution is to set the
min_align_mask field as Christop suggested.

> 
> >
> >>   	}
> >
> > The whole approach here is to do dma remapping on each individual page
> > of the I/O buffer.  But wouldn't it be possible to use dma_map_sg() to map
> > each scatterlist entry as a unit?  Each scatterlist entry describes a range of
> > physically contiguous memory.  After dma_map_sg(), the resulting dma
> > address must also refer to a physically contiguous range in the swiotlb
> > bounce buffer memory.   So at the top of the "for" loop over the scatterlist
> > entries, do dma_map_sg() if we're in an isolated VM.  Then compute the
> > hvpfn value based on the dma address instead of sg_page().  But everything
> > else is the same, and the inner loop for populating the pfn_arry is unmodified.
> > Furthermore, the dma_range array that you've added is not needed, since
> > scatterlist entries already have a dma_address field for saving the mapped
> > address, and dma_unmap_sg() uses that field.
> 
> I don't use dma_map_sg() here in order to avoid introducing one more
> loop(e,g dma_map_sg()). We already have a loop to populate
> cmd_request->dma_range[] and so do the dma map in the same loop.
> 

I'm not seeing where the additional loop comes from.  Storvsc
already has a loop through the sgl entries.  Retain that loop and call
dma_map_sg() with nents set to 1.  Then the sequence is
dma_map_sg() --> dma_map_sg_attrs() --> dma_direct_map_sg() ->
dma_direct_map_page().  The latter function will call swiotlb_map()
to map all pages of the sgl entry as a single operation.

Michael