[syzbot] linux-next boot error: possible deadlock in blktrans_open

From: syzbot
Date: Fri Aug 20 2021 - 12:48:20 EST

Next message: syzbot: "[syzbot] WARNING in split_huge_page_to_list"
Previous message: Doug Anderson: "Re: [PATCH linux-next] debug:kdb: fix unsigned int win compared to less than zero"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 86ed57fd8c93 Add linux-next specific files for 20210820
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1776d189300000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f64eccb415bd479d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a44be5792ded9c017a13
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+a44be5792ded9c017a13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc6-next-20210820-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
systemd-udevd/4540 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8c5df508 (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blktrans_open+0x69/0x600 drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:210

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88801d051918 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x9b/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1227

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x135/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
bd_register_pending_holders+0x2c/0x470 block/holder.c:153
register_disk block/genhd.c:456 [inline]
device_add_disk+0x376/0xcf0 block/genhd.c:551
add_mtd_blktrans_dev+0xdd1/0x1610 drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:430
mtdblock_add_mtd+0x20f/0x2c0 drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c:329
blktrans_notify_add drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:510 [inline]
blktrans_notify_add+0x7a/0xc0 drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:502
add_mtd_device+0xa8e/0x1170 drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c:690
mtd_device_parse_register+0x510/0x870 drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c:979
mtdram_init_device+0x295/0x350 drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c:146
init_mtdram+0xe5/0x177 drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c:171
do_one_initcall+0x103/0x650 init/main.c:1292
do_initcall_level init/main.c:1367 [inline]
do_initcalls init/main.c:1383 [inline]
do_basic_setup init/main.c:1402 [inline]
kernel_init_freeable+0x6b4/0x73d init/main.c:1604
kernel_init+0x1a/0x1d0 init/main.c:1496
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295

-> #0 (mtd_table_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a25/0x54e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x135/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
blktrans_open+0x69/0x600 drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:210
blkdev_get_whole+0x9d/0x2b0 fs/block_dev.c:1079
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x354/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1234
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:826
do_open fs/namei.c:3428 [inline]
path_openat+0x1cbe/0x28b0 fs/namei.c:3561
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3588
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1204
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1220 [inline]
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1228 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1224 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1224
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock(mtd_table_mutex);
lock(&disk->open_mutex);
lock(mtd_table_mutex);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by systemd-udevd/4540:
#0: ffff88801d051918 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x9b/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1227

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 4540 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6-next-20210820-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x262/0x2f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a25/0x54e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:596 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x135/0x12f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
blktrans_open+0x69/0x600 drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c:210
blkdev_get_whole+0x9d/0x2b0 fs/block_dev.c:1079
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x354/0xb60 fs/block_dev.c:1234
blkdev_get_by_dev fs/block_dev.c:1323 [inline]
blkdev_open+0x295/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1329
do_dentry_open+0x4c8/0x11d0 fs/open.c:826
do_open fs/namei.c:3428 [inline]
path_openat+0x1cbe/0x28b0 fs/namei.c:3561
do_filp_open+0x1aa/0x400 fs/namei.c:3588
do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4e0 fs/open.c:1204
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1220 [inline]
__do_sys_open fs/open.c:1228 [inline]
__se_sys_open fs/open.c:1224 [inline]
__x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1224
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7faf61bb2840
Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 68 77 20 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 89 bb 20 00 00 75 10 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 1e f6 ff ff 48 89 04 24
RSP: 002b:00007ffffbf04508 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055c752d73830 RCX: 00007faf61bb2840
RDX: 000055c751371fe3 RSI: 00000000000a0800 RDI: 000055c752d64f90
RBP: 00007ffffbf04680 R08: 000055c751371670 R09: 0000000000000020
R10: 000055c751371d0c R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffffbf045d0
R13: 000055c752d65880 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 000000000000000e

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Next message: syzbot: "[syzbot] WARNING in split_huge_page_to_list"
Previous message: Doug Anderson: "Re: [PATCH linux-next] debug:kdb: fix unsigned int win compared to less than zero"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]