Re: [PATCH 0/3] amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain

[Kefeng Wang]

On 2021/8/23 17:05, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:19:23AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > On 2021/8/18 6:27, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:46:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > > Patch 1 and 2 make some cleanup, and patch 3 use of_irq_get() instead of
> > > > irq_of_parse_and_map() to get irq number, return -EPROBE_DEFER if the irq
> > > > domain is not yet created, amba_device_add() will properly to handle the
> > > > no IRQ domain issue via deferred probe.
> > > >
> > > > Kefeng Wang (3):
> > > >     amba: Drop unused functions about APB/AHB devices add
> > > >     Revert "ARM: amba: make use of -1 IRQs warn"
> > > >     amba: Properly handle device probe without IRQ domain
> > > >
> > > >    drivers/amba/bus.c       | 100 ++++++++++-----------------------------
> > > >    drivers/of/platform.c    |   6 +--
> > > >    include/linux/amba/bus.h |  18 -------
> > > >    3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Thanks Rob.
> >
> > Hi Russell, should I send the patches to the ARM patch system?
> Yes please - I'll try to squeeze it in for this cycle but it's getting
> a tad late for that. Thanks.

Done, but the sequence of patches is reordered at ARM patch system, 
(using git send-email

and deliver patch1/2/3 in order).

BTW,  could you give me some direction the following patchset[1] too if 
you have time, I have

addressed your comments and resend, but there's been no new feedback for 
a long time.

If it is too late for this cycle, I could resend them after 5.15-rc1.

Many thanks.

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210610123556.171328-1-wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx/



>