Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: r8188eu: Use usb_control_msg_recv/send() in usbctrl_vendorreq()

From: Pavel Skripkin
Date: Tue Aug 24 2021 - 10:35:45 EST


On 8/24/21 5:28 PM, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
Replace usb_control_msg() with the new usb_control_msg_recv() and
usb_control_msg_send() API of USB Core in usbctrl_vendorreq().
Remove no more needed variables. Move out of an if-else block
some code that it is no more dependent on status < 0. Remove
redundant code depending on status > 0 or status == len.

Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@xxxxxxxxx>
---

v1->v2: According to suggestions by Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>, remove 'pipe' and pass an explicit 0
to the new API. According to suggestions by Pavel Skripkin
<paskripkin@xxxxxxxxx>, remove an extra if-else that is no more needed,
since status can be 0 and < 0 and there is no 3rd state, like it was before.
Many thanks to both them and to Phillip Potter <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
who kindly offered his time for the purpose of testing v1.

drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c | 45 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c
index a93d5cfe4635..13e925d21e00 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c
@@ -15,9 +15,7 @@ static int usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u16 value, void *pdata,
struct adapter *adapt = pintfhdl->padapter;
struct dvobj_priv *dvobjpriv = adapter_to_dvobj(adapt);
struct usb_device *udev = dvobjpriv->pusbdev;
- unsigned int pipe;
int status = 0;
- u8 reqtype;
u8 *pIo_buf;
int vendorreq_times = 0;
@@ -44,22 +42,22 @@ static int usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u16 value, void *pdata,
}
while (++vendorreq_times <= MAX_USBCTRL_VENDORREQ_TIMES) {
- memset(pIo_buf, 0, len);
-
if (requesttype == 0x01) {
- pipe = usb_rcvctrlpipe(udev, 0);/* read_in */
- reqtype = REALTEK_USB_VENQT_READ;
+ status = usb_control_msg_recv(udev, 0, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_REQ,
+ REALTEK_USB_VENQT_READ, value,
+ REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX, pIo_buf,
+ len, RTW_USB_CONTROL_MSG_TIMEOUT,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
} else {
- pipe = usb_sndctrlpipe(udev, 0);/* write_out */
- reqtype = REALTEK_USB_VENQT_WRITE;
memcpy(pIo_buf, pdata, len);
+ status = usb_control_msg_send(udev, 0, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_REQ,
+ REALTEK_USB_VENQT_WRITE, value,
+ REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX, pIo_buf,
+ len, RTW_USB_CONTROL_MSG_TIMEOUT,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
}
- status = usb_control_msg(udev, pipe, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_REQ,
- reqtype, value, REALTEK_USB_VENQT_CMD_IDX,
- pIo_buf, len, RTW_USB_CONTROL_MSG_TIMEOUT);
-
- if (status == len) { /* Success this control transfer. */
+ if (!status) { /* Success this control transfer. */
rtw_reset_continual_urb_error(dvobjpriv);
if (requesttype == 0x01)
memcpy(pdata, pIo_buf, len);
@@ -68,20 +66,11 @@ static int usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u16 value, void *pdata,
value, (requesttype == 0x01) ? "read" : "write",
len, status, *(u32 *)pdata, vendorreq_times);
- if (status < 0) {
- if (status == (-ESHUTDOWN) || status == -ENODEV) {
- adapt->bSurpriseRemoved = true;
- } else {
- struct hal_data_8188e *haldata = GET_HAL_DATA(adapt);
- haldata->srestpriv.Wifi_Error_Status = USB_VEN_REQ_CMD_FAIL;
- }
- } else { /* status != len && status >= 0 */
- if (status > 0) {
- if (requesttype == 0x01) {
- /* For Control read transfer, we have to copy the read data from pIo_buf to pdata. */
- memcpy(pdata, pIo_buf, len);
- }
- }
+ if (status == (-ESHUTDOWN) || status == -ENODEV) {
+ adapt->bSurpriseRemoved = true;
+ } else {
+ struct hal_data_8188e *haldata = GET_HAL_DATA(adapt);
+ haldata->srestpriv.Wifi_Error_Status = USB_VEN_REQ_CMD_FAIL;
}
if (rtw_inc_and_chk_continual_urb_error(dvobjpriv)) {
@@ -92,7 +81,7 @@ static int usbctrl_vendorreq(struct intf_hdl *pintfhdl, u16 value, void *pdata,
}
/* firmware download is checksumed, don't retry */
- if ((value >= FW_8188E_START_ADDRESS && value <= FW_8188E_END_ADDRESS) || status == len)
+ if (value >= FW_8188E_START_ADDRESS && value <= FW_8188E_END_ADDRESS)
break;


Shouldn't we break the loop when we have received all data? I think,
status == len should be replaced with !status. Correct me if I am wrong.


Other changes look good to me, thanks



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin