[PATCH 5.4 35/61] bnxt_en: Add missing DMA memory barriers

[Sasha Levin]

From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 828affc27ed43441bd1efdaf4e07e96dd43a0362 ]

Each completion ring entry has a valid bit to indicate that the entry
contains a valid completion event.  The driver's main poll loop
__bnxt_poll_work() has the proper dma_rmb() to make sure the valid
bit of the next entry has been checked before proceeding further.
But when we call bnxt_rx_pkt() to process the RX event, the RX
completion event consists of two completion entries and only the
first entry has been checked to be valid.  We need the same barrier
after checking the next completion entry.  Add missing dma_rmb()
barriers in bnxt_rx_pkt() and other similar locations.

Fixes: 67a95e2022c7 ("bnxt_en: Need memory barrier when processing the completion ring.")
Reported-by: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 1b5839ad97b6..e67f07faca78 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -1724,6 +1724,10 @@ static int bnxt_rx_pkt(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
 	if (!RX_CMP_VALID(rxcmp1, tmp_raw_cons))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
+	/* The valid test of the entry must be done first before
+	 * reading any further.
+	 */
+	dma_rmb();
 	prod = rxr->rx_prod;
 
 	if (cmp_type == CMP_TYPE_RX_L2_TPA_START_CMP) {
@@ -1918,6 +1922,10 @@ static int bnxt_force_rx_discard(struct bnxt *bp,
 	if (!RX_CMP_VALID(rxcmp1, tmp_raw_cons))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
+	/* The valid test of the entry must be done first before
+	 * reading any further.
+	 */
+	dma_rmb();
 	cmp_type = RX_CMP_TYPE(rxcmp);
 	if (cmp_type == CMP_TYPE_RX_L2_CMP) {
 		rxcmp1->rx_cmp_cfa_code_errors_v2 |=
@@ -2314,6 +2322,10 @@ static int bnxt_poll_nitroa0(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 		if (!TX_CMP_VALID(txcmp, raw_cons))
 			break;
 
+		/* The valid test of the entry must be done first before
+		 * reading any further.
+		 */
+		dma_rmb();
 		if ((TX_CMP_TYPE(txcmp) & 0x30) == 0x10) {
 			tmp_raw_cons = NEXT_RAW_CMP(raw_cons);
 			cp_cons = RING_CMP(tmp_raw_cons);
-- 
2.30.2