Re: [PATCH linux-next] arm64: PCI: Introduce pcibios_free_irq() helper function

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi
Date: Wed Aug 25 2021 - 09:30:45 EST


On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 03:16:12PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> Introduce pcibios_free_irq() to free irq in pci_device_probe() and
> pci_device_remove() that in drivers/pci/pci-driver.c.

Add a rationale - it is just code inspection or you are fixing a bug ?

> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 1006ed2d7c60..40da5aff4548 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,18 @@
> int pcibios_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> if (!acpi_disabled)
> - acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
> + return acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);

This is an unrelated change and it is potentially introducing
regressions. I need to page in the reasons why on arm64 we had to resort
to pcibios_alloc_irq() (probe ordering IIRC) - in the meanwhile
this function stays as it is.

> return 0;
> }
> +
> +void pcibios_free_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + if (!acpi_disabled)
> + acpi_pci_irq_disable(dev);
> +
> +}

Adding pcibios_free_irq() makes sense and I believe it is a genuine
"fix".

Please add any information in the commit log that explains the
run-time condition you are fixing.

Thanks,
Lorenzo