Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: fix docs typos and references to previous struct names

[Paulo Miguel Almeida]

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:44:01AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 09:27:57PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 08:12:54AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 12:08:36PM +1200, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> > > > In the comments there where some grammar mistakes and references to
> > > > struct names that have gotten renamed over time but not reflected
> > > > in the comments.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> > > > index d5c1521192c1..1fae62c40661 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.h
> > > > @@ -5,16 +5,15 @@
> > > >   * userspace interface for pi433 radio module
> > > >   *
> > > >   * Pi433 is a 433MHz radio module for the Raspberry Pi.
> > > > - * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore inside of this
> > > > - * driver, you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
> > > > + * It is based on the HopeRf Module RFM69CW. Therefore, inside of this
> > > > + * driver you'll find an abstraction of the rf69 chip.
> > > >   *
> > > > - * If needed, this driver could be extended, to also support other
> > > > - * devices, basing on HopeRfs rf69.
> > > > + * If needed this driver could also be extended to support other
> > > > + * devices based on HopeRf rf69 as well as HopeRf modules with a similar
> > > > + * interface such as RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95 and so on.
> > > >   *
> > > > - * The driver can also be extended, to support other modules of
> > > > - * HopeRf with a similar interace - e. g. RFM69HCW, RFM12, RFM95, ...
> > > >   * Copyright (C) 2016 Wolf-Entwicklungen
> > > > - *	Marcus Wolf <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > + * Marcus Wolf <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Indentation of the name should remain here, right?
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > you are right, I shouldn't have changed that line. Do you need me to
> > send another patch without that line or can you ignore just that line 
> > before merging it to your branch? I'm flexible with any approach.
> 
> It is impossible to just "ignore a single line" in a diff, sorry.
> 
> Please fix up and resend a new version, remember the work needs to be
> done by the developer, not the maintainer.  Your job is to make it
> trivial for me to accept your change.  Manually having to edit diffs is
> not scalable at all.
> 

Ok. I will do it shortly

Best regards,

Paulo Almeida