Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: apple: Add PCIe node

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Mark,

On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 18:15:29 +0100,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add node corresponding to the apcie,t8103 node in the
> Apple device tree for the Mac mini (M1, 2020).
> 
> Clock references and DART (IOMMU) references are left out at the
> moment and will be added once the appropriate bindings have been
> settled upon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103.dtsi | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103.dtsi
> index 503a76fc30e6..6e4677bdef44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103.dtsi
> @@ -214,5 +214,68 @@ pinctrl_smc: pinctrl@23e820000 {
>  				     <AIC_IRQ 396 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <AIC_IRQ 397 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		};
> +
> +		pcie0: pcie@690000000 {
> +			compatible = "apple,t8103-pcie", "apple,pcie";
> +			device_type = "pci";
> +
> +			reg = <0x6 0x90000000 0x0 0x1000000>,
> +			      <0x6 0x80000000 0x0 0x4000>,
> +			      <0x6 0x81000000 0x0 0x8000>,
> +			      <0x6 0x82000000 0x0 0x8000>,
> +			      <0x6 0x83000000 0x0 0x8000>;
> +			reg-names = "config", "rc", "port0", "port1", "port2";
> +
> +			interrupt-parent = <&aic>;
> +			interrupts = <AIC_IRQ 695 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <AIC_IRQ 698 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +				     <AIC_IRQ 701 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> +			msi-controller;
> +			msi-parent = <&pcie0>;
> +			msi-ranges = <&aic AIC_IRQ 704 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING 32>;
> +
> +			bus-range = <0 3>;
> +			#address-cells = <3>;
> +			#size-cells = <2>;
> +			ranges = <0x43000000 0x6 0xa0000000 0x6 0xa0000000 0x0 0x20000000>,
> +				 <0x02000000 0x0 0xc0000000 0x6 0xc0000000 0x0 0x40000000>;
> +
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_pins>;
> +			pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> +			pci@0,0 {
> +				device_type = "pci";
> +				reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> +				reset-gpios = <&pinctrl_ap 152 0>;
> +				max-link-speed = <2>;
> +
> +				#address-cells = <3>;
> +				#size-cells = <2>;
> +				ranges;
> +			};
> +
> +			pci@1,0 {
> +				device_type = "pci";
> +				reg = <0x800 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> +				reset-gpios = <&pinctrl_ap 153 0>;
> +				max-link-speed = <2>;
> +
> +				#address-cells = <3>;
> +				#size-cells = <2>;
> +				ranges;
> +			};
> +
> +			pci@2,0 {
> +				device_type = "pci";
> +				reg = <0x1000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> +				reset-gpios = <&pinctrl_ap 33 0>;
> +				max-link-speed = <1>;
> +
> +				#address-cells = <3>;
> +				#size-cells = <2>;
> +				ranges;
> +			};
> +		};
>  	};
>  };

I have now implemented the MSI change on the Linux driver side, and it
works nicely. So thumbs up from me on this front.

I am now looking at the interrupts provided by each port:
(1) a bunch of port-private interrupts (link up/down...)
(2) INTx interrupts

Given that the programming is per-port, I've implemented this as a
per-port interrupt controller.

(1) is dead easy to implement, and doesn't require any DT description.
(2) is unfortunately exposing the limits of my DT knowledge, and I'm
not clear how to model it. I came up with the following:

	port00: pci@0,0 {
		device_type = "pci";
		reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
		reset-gpios = <&pinctrl_ap 152 0>;
		max-link-speed = <2>;

		#address-cells = <3>;
		#size-cells = <2>;
		ranges;

		interrupt-controller;
		#interrupt-cells = <1>;
		interrupt-parent = <&port00>;
		interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 7>;
		interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &port00 0>,
				<0 0 0 2 &port00 1>,
				<0 0 0 3 &port00 2>,
				<0 0 0 4 &port00 3>;
	};

which vaguely seem to do the right thing for the devices behind root
ports, but doesn't seem to work for INTx generated by the root ports
themselves. Any clue? Alternatively, I could move it to something
global to the whole PCIe controller, but that doesn't seem completely
right.

It also begs the question whether the per-port interrupt to the AIC
should be moved into each root port, should my per-port approach hold
any water.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.