Re: [RFC] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory

[David Hildenbrand]

On 31.08.21 22:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot for this summary. A question about the requirement: do
> > > we or
> > > do we not have plan to support assigned device to the protected VM?
> >
> > Good question, I assume that is stuff for the far far future.
>
> It is in principle possible with the current TDX, but not secure. But
> someone might decide to do it. So it would be good to have basic support
> at least.

Can you elaborate the "not secure" part? Do you mean, making the device 
only access "shared" memory, not secure/encrypted/whatsoever?

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb