Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Add temperature notification exception handling

[Bart Van Assche]

On 9/1/21 5:37 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> It is essentially up to the platform to decide what further actions need
> to be taken. So add a designated vop for that.  Each chipset vendor can
> decide if it wants to use the thermal subsystem, hw monitor, or some
> Privet implementation.

Why to make chipset vendors define what to do in case of extreme 
temperatures? I'd prefer a single implementation in ufshcd.c instead of 
making each vendor come up with a different implementation.

> +	void	(*temp_notify)(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 status);

Please do not add new vops without adding at least one implementation of 
that vop.

Thanks,

Bart.