Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add support to get the vcpuid from MPIDR_EL1

[Raghavendra Rao Ananta]

On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:37 AM Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:48:12PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:14:07PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> > > At times, such as when in the interrupt handler, the guest wants to
> > > get the vCPU-id that it's running on. As a result, introduce
> > > get_vcpuid() that parses the MPIDR_EL1 and returns the vcpuid to the
> > > requested caller.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
> > > index c35bb7b8e870..8b372cd427da 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
> > > @@ -251,4 +251,23 @@ static inline void local_irq_disable(void)
> > >     asm volatile("msr daifset, #3" : : : "memory");
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS 8
> > > +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level) (MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS * level)
> > > +#define MPIDR_LEVEL_MASK ((1 << MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS) - 1)
> > > +#define MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, level) \
> > > +   ((mpidr >> MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & MPIDR_LEVEL_MASK)
> > > +
> > > +static inline uint32_t get_vcpuid(void)
> > > +{
> > > +   uint32_t vcpuid = 0;
> > > +   uint64_t mpidr = read_sysreg(mpidr_el1);
> > > +
> > > +   /* KVM limits only 16 vCPUs at level 0 */
> > > +   vcpuid = mpidr & 0x0f;
> > > +   vcpuid |= MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) << 4;
> > > +   vcpuid |= MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) << 12;
> > > +
> > > +   return vcpuid;
> > > +}
> >
> > Are we guaranteed that KVM will always compose vCPU IDs the same way? I
> > do not believe this is guaranteed ABI.
>
> I don't believe we are. At least in QEMU we take pains to avoid that
> assumption.
>
> >
> > For the base case, you could pass the vCPU ID as an arg to the guest
> > function.
> >
> > I do agree that finding the vCPU ID is a bit more challenging in an
> > interrupt context. Maybe use a ucall to ask userspace? But of course,
> > every test implements its own run loop, so its yet another case that
> > tests need to handle.
> >
> > Or, you could allocate an array at runtime of length KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS
> > (use the KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION ioctl to get the value). Once all vCPUs are
> > instantiated, iterate over them from userspace to populate the {MPIDR,
> > VCPU_ID} map. You'd need to guarantee that callers initialize the vGIC
> > *after* adding vCPUs to the guest.
>
> I agree with this approach. It may even make sense to create a common
> function that returns a {cpu_id,vcpu_index} map for other tests to use.
>
Interesting idea. I'll look into this.

Regards,
Raghavendra

> Thanks,
> drew
>
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Oliver
> >
> > >  #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PROCESSOR_H */
> > > --
> > > 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kvmarm mailing list
> > kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
> >
>