Re: [GIT PULL] (swiotlb) stable/for-linus-5.15

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:51 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "essentially"? "shouldn't be expected"? I'm not getting a lot of warm
> > and fuzzies from that. I'd like to have something a bit more concrete.
>
> As above, upstream Kconfigs do prevent any possible overlap at the
> moment (with "swiotlb: use depends on for DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL" fixing
> the bug which inadvertently made SWIOTLB user-selectable).

Ok. I've done the merge, I do hope that this code can be clarified at
some point in the future.

             Linus