Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] sched: cgroup SCHED_IDLE support

[alexs]

...
 
> For now, we maintain the existing SCHED_IDLE semantics. Future patches
> may make improvements that extend how we treat SCHED_IDLE entities.
> 
> The per-task_group idle field is an integer that currently only holds
> either a 0 or a 1. This is explicitly typed as an integer to allow for
> further extensions to this API. For example, a negative value may
> indicate a highly latency-sensitive cgroup that should be preferred for
> preemption/placement/etc.

Hi Josh,

Sounds there is a ready solutions for colocation problem, isn't there?
I'd like to evaluate its effects if it could be sent out.

Thanks
Alex
>