On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
Thank you for testing release candidates and releases [1]. Is your testNot really, except its source is available at github:
setup documented somewhere?
https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test
If not happening already, could the Linux messages (at least up to log level
warning) also be monitored? For example, in Linux 5.14, a new warning snuck
in by cefc7ca462 (ACPI: PRM: implement OperationRegion handler for the
PlatformRtMechanism subtype) [2], which could have been caught early on, and
fixed before the release.
The test summaries would then also notify about possible behavior change.
Logs are available and can be examined at kerneltests.org/builders.
Reports are generated manually, so it would be way too much effort to add
build warnings to those. Besides, logs are way too noisy to be useful in a
summary e-mail.
Also, Geert's build reports already provide build warnings and errors.
The same applies to reports sent by 0-day. Indeed, I do see at least
one 0-day report against commit cefc7ca46235.
What would be the point of adding yet another report of buildIf the functionality already exists, great. But to be clear, it’s about the runtime logs.
warnings on top of that ?