[PATCH] message: fusion: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
From: Qing Wang
Date: Fri Sep 17 2021 - 03:18:28 EST
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
While at it, some 'dma_set_mask()/dma_set_coherent_mask()' have been
updated to a much less verbose 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()'.
This type of patches has been going on for a long time, I plan to
clean it up in the near future. If needed, see post from
Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <wangqing@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c | 31 +++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
index 7f7abc9..c255d8a
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
@@ -1666,16 +1666,12 @@ mpt_mapresources(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
const uint64_t required_mask = dma_get_required_mask
(&pdev->dev);
if (required_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
- && !pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
+ && dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
ioc->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
dinitprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT
": 64 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED\n",
ioc->name));
- } else if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ } else if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
ioc->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
dinitprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT
": 32 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED\n",
@@ -1686,9 +1682,7 @@ mpt_mapresources(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
goto out_pci_release_region;
}
} else {
- if (!pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
ioc->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
dinitprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_INFO_FMT
": 32 BIT PCI BUS DMA ADDRESSING SUPPORTED\n",
@@ -4452,9 +4446,7 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
*/
if (ioc->pcidev->device == MPI_MANUFACTPAGE_DEVID_SAS1078 &&
ioc->dma_mask > DMA_BIT_MASK(35)) {
- if (!pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
- && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(35);
d36memprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_DEBUG_FMT
"setting 35 bit addressing for "
@@ -4462,10 +4454,7 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
ioc->name));
} else {
/*Reseting DMA mask to 64 bit*/
- pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
+ dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT
"failed setting 35 bit addressing for "
@@ -4600,9 +4589,8 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
alloc_dma += ioc->reply_sz;
}
- if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) && !pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- ioc->dma_mask) && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- ioc->dma_mask))
+ if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) &&
+ !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, ioc->dma_mask))
d36memprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_DEBUG_FMT
"restoring 64 bit addressing\n", ioc->name));
@@ -4625,9 +4613,8 @@ PrimeIocFifos(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc)
ioc->sense_buf_pool = NULL;
}
- if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) && !pci_set_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) && !pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(ioc->pcidev,
- DMA_BIT_MASK(64)))
+ if (dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(35) &&
+ !dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&ioc->pcidev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)))
d36memprintk(ioc, printk(MYIOC_s_DEBUG_FMT
"restoring 64 bit addressing\n", ioc->name));
--
2.7.4