Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use sysconf to simplify libbpf_num_possible_cpus

[Muhammad Falak Wani]

> "This patch is a part ([0]) of libbpf-1.0 milestone.
> 
>   [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issue/383
> 
> Please update in the next revision.
Sure, will send in a V2 of the patch.
> 
> 
> Also, keep in mind that we ask to use "[PATCH bpf-next]" prefix when
> submitting patches against the bpf-next kernel tree. It makes the
> intent clear and our BPF CI system knows which tree to test against.
> Thanks.
> 
Apologies, duly noted for subsequent patches.

> I'd say it's still a good idea for explicitness and to show that we
> didn't forget about it :) Plus, if it actually ever fails, we don't
> want to WRITE_ONCE() here, so please follow the same error handling
> logic as it was previously with parse_cpu_mask_file.
> 
> >
> >         WRITE_ONCE(cpus, tmp_cpus);
> >         return tmp_cpus;
Sure, will adhere to the coding style.

Thank you for your reivew.

-mfrw