Re: [RFC PATCH] xtensa: setup: use CONFIG_USE_OF instead of CONFIG_OF

From: Max Filippov
Date: Sun Sep 26 2021 - 15:01:04 EST


Hi Randy,

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 8:29 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CONFIG_OF can be set by a randconfig or by a user -- without setting the
> early flattree option (OF_EARLY_FLATTREE). This causes build errors.
> However, if randconfig or a user sets USE_OF in the Xtensa config,
> the right kconfig symbols are set to enable xtensa/kernel/setup.c to
> build.
>
> Fixes these build errors:
>
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c: In function 'xtensa_dt_io_area':
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c:201:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_flat_dt_is_compatible'; did you mean 'of_machine_is_compatible'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 201 | if (!of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "simple-bus"))
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c:204:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_get_flat_dt_prop' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 204 | ranges = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ranges", &len);
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c:204:16: error: assignment to 'const __be32 *' {aka 'const unsigned int *'} from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
> 204 | ranges = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ranges", &len);
> | ^
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c: In function 'early_init_devtree':
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c:228:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'early_init_dt_scan'; did you mean 'early_init_devtree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 228 | early_init_dt_scan(params);
> ../arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c:229:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_scan_flat_dt' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 229 | of_scan_flat_dt(xtensa_dt_io_area, NULL);
>
> Fixes: da844a81779e ("xtensa: add device trees support")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Thanks for your RFC. I've tested it and found a couple more places
where CONFIG_USE_OF should be used instead of CONFIG_OF.
I'll post the revised version.

--
Thanks.
-- Max