Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/5] devlink: Allow set specific ops callbacks dynamically

From: Leon Romanovsky
Date: Wed Sep 29 2021 - 08:58:36 EST


On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 02:25:00PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:00:44PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > +void devlink_set_ops(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_ops *ops)
> > +{
> > + struct devlink_ops *dev_ops = devlink->ops;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(!devlink_reload_actions_valid(ops));
> > +
> > +#define SET_DEVICE_OP(ptr, op, name) \
> > + do { \
> > + if ((op)->name) \
> > + if (!((ptr)->name)) \
> > + (ptr)->name = (op)->name; \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > + /* Keep sorted */
> > + SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, ops, reload_actions);
> > + SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, ops, reload_down);
> > + SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, ops, reload_limits);
> > + SET_DEVICE_OP(dev_ops, ops, reload_up);
>
> Keep sorted in what order? And why?

Sorted by name.

It simplifies future addition of new commands and removes useless fraction
where place new line.

Thanks

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h