Re: [PATCH v17 00/15] arm64: MMU enabled kexec relocation

[Pasha Tatashin]

> FWIW, I'm fine with this series. I think the only concern raised by
> James and not addressed is the possibility of the failure of the memory
> allocation for copying the page tables during kexec. If anyone will
> complain in the future, we can look into adding a fallback mechanism to
> do the relocation with the MMU off.
>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>

Thank you.

Pasha