Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal: qcom: tsens-v1: Add support for MSM8992/4 TSENS

From: Thara Gopinath
Date: Thu Sep 30 2021 - 07:19:10 EST

Next message: Matti Vaittinen: "Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: omap-prm: Fix external abort for am335x pruss"
Previous message: Zhu Yanjun: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] Providers/rxe: Add dma-buf support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 9/4/21 5:15 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

MSM8994, despite being heavily based on MSM8974, uses the
1.2 version of TSENS. Also, 8994 being 8994, it has a custom
way of calculating the slope.

MSM8992 in turn is a cut-down version of MSM8994 and uses
the same TSENS hardware, albeit with a different set of sensors.

Also tested on 8976 (by a person who didn't want to be named)
to make sure the 11->16 max_sensors changes didn't break anything.

Hi Konrad,

Thanks for the patch and sorry for the delay. A few nits below.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- Squash the few lines of 8992 here
- Add some informative comments
- Adjust the slope definition for non-anglosaxon-school-system people
- Change base0 and base1 into ints, no need for them to be arrays
- Default p[] to the magic value and only overwrite it if need be
- Use %u for u32 values

drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c | 299 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 6 +
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
index 573e261ccca7..c207a63f8e88 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
@@ -142,6 +142,99 @@
#define CAL_SEL_MASK 7
#define CAL_SEL_SHIFT 0
+/* eeprom layout data for 8994 */
+#define MSM8994_BASE0_MASK 0x3ff
+#define MSM8994_BASE1_MASK 0xffc00
+#define MSM8994_BASE0_SHIFT 0
+#define MSM8994_BASE1_SHIFT 10
+
+#define MSM8994_S0_MASK 0xf00000
+#define MSM8994_S1_MASK 0xf000000
+#define MSM8994_S2_MASK 0xf0000000
+#define MSM8994_S3_MASK 0xf
+#define MSM8994_S4_MASK 0xf0
+#define MSM8994_S5_MASK 0xf00
+#define MSM8994_S6_MASK 0xf000
+#define MSM8994_S7_MASK 0xf0000
+#define MSM8994_S8_MASK 0xf00000
+#define MSM8994_S9_MASK 0xf000000
+#define MSM8994_S10_MASK 0xf0000000
+#define MSM8994_S11_MASK 0xf
+#define MSM8994_S12_MASK 0xf0
+#define MSM8994_S13_MASK 0xf00
+#define MSM8994_S14_MASK 0xf000
+#define MSM8994_S15_MASK 0xf0000
+
+#define MSM8994_S0_SHIFT 20
+#define MSM8994_S1_SHIFT 24
+#define MSM8994_S2_SHIFT 28
+#define MSM8994_S3_SHIFT 0
+#define MSM8994_S4_SHIFT 4
+#define MSM8994_S5_SHIFT 8
+#define MSM8994_S6_SHIFT 12
+#define MSM8994_S7_SHIFT 16
+#define MSM8994_S8_SHIFT 20
+#define MSM8994_S9_SHIFT 24
+#define MSM8994_S10_SHIFT 28
+#define MSM8994_S11_SHIFT 0
+#define MSM8994_S12_SHIFT 4
+#define MSM8994_S13_SHIFT 8
+#define MSM8994_S14_SHIFT 12
+#define MSM8994_S15_SHIFT 16
+
+#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_MASK 0x700000
+#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 20
+
+#define MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_MASK 0x7fe00000
+#define MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_MASK 0x80000000
+#define MSM8994_BASE1_BIT1_9_REDUN_MASK 0x1ff
+#define MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_SHIFT 21
+#define MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_SHIFT_COMPUTE 31
+
+#define MSM8994_S0_REDUN_MASK 0x1e00
+#define MSM8994_S1_REDUN_MASK 0x1e000
+#define MSM8994_S2_REDUN_MASK 0x1e0000
+#define MSM8994_S3_REDUN_MASK 0x1e00000
+#define MSM8994_S4_REDUN_MASK 0x1e000000
+#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT0_2 0xe0000000
+#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT3 0x800000
+#define MSM8994_S6_REDUN_MASK 0xf000000
+#define MSM8994_S7_REDUN_MASK 0xf0000000
+#define MSM8994_S8_REDUN_MASK 0xf
+#define MSM8994_S9_REDUN_MASK 0xf0
+#define MSM8994_S10_REDUN_MASK 0xf00
+#define MSM8994_S11_REDUN_MASK 0xf000
+#define MSM8994_S12_REDUN_MASK 0xf0000
+#define MSM8994_S13_REDUN_MASK 0xf00000
+#define MSM8994_S14_REDUN_MASK 0xf000000
+#define MSM8994_S15_REDUN_MASK 0xf0000000
+
+#define MSM8994_S0_REDUN_SHIFT 9
+#define MSM8994_S1_REDUN_SHIFT 13
+#define MSM8994_S2_REDUN_SHIFT 17
+#define MSM8994_S3_REDUN_SHIFT 21
+#define MSM8994_S4_REDUN_SHIFT 25
+#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT0_2 29
+#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT3 23
+#define MSM8994_S6_REDUN_SHIFT 24
+#define MSM8994_S7_REDUN_SHIFT 28
+#define MSM8994_S8_REDUN_SHIFT 0
+#define MSM8994_S9_REDUN_SHIFT 4
+#define MSM8994_S10_REDUN_SHIFT 8
+#define MSM8994_S11_REDUN_SHIFT 12
+#define MSM8994_S12_REDUN_SHIFT 16
+#define MSM8994_S13_REDUN_SHIFT 20
+#define MSM8994_S14_REDUN_SHIFT 24
+#define MSM8994_S15_REDUN_SHIFT 28
+
+#define MSM8994_REDUN_SEL_MASK 0x7
+#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_MASK 0xe0000000
+#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_SHIFT 29
+
+#define BKP_SEL 0x3
+#define BKP_REDUN_SEL 0xe0000000
+#define BKP_REDUN_SHIFT 29
+
static void compute_intercept_slope_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv,
u32 *p1, u32 *p2, u32 mode)
{
@@ -166,6 +259,29 @@ static void compute_intercept_slope_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv,
}
}
+/* HW-specific calculations forwardported from msm-3.10 kernel */
+static void compute_intercept_slope_8994(struct tsens_priv *priv,
+ u32 base0, u32 base1, u32 *p, u32 mode)
+{
+ int adc_code_of_tempx, i, num, den, slope;
+
+ /* slope (m, dy/dx) = SLOPE_FACTOR * (adc_code2 - adc_code1)/(temp_120_degc - temp_30_degc) */
+ num = base1 - base0;
+ num *= SLOPE_FACTOR;

Combine into one line please. (base1 - base0) * SLOPE_FACTOR

+ den = CAL_DEGC_PT2 - CAL_DEGC_PT1;
+ slope = num / den;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
+ adc_code_of_tempx = base0 + p[i];
+ priv->sensor[i].offset = (adc_code_of_tempx * SLOPE_FACTOR) -
+ (CAL_DEGC_PT1 * priv->sensor[i].slope);

Is this intentional? To use priv->sensor[i].slope before computing it below ?

+ priv->sensor[i].slope = (mode == TWO_PT_CALIB) ? slope : SLOPE_DEFAULT;
+
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: offset:%d, slope:%d\n", __func__,
+ priv->sensor[i].offset, priv->sensor[i].slope);
+ }
+}
+
static int calibrate_v1(struct tsens_priv *priv)
{
u32 base0 = 0, base1 = 0;
@@ -297,14 +413,145 @@ static int calibrate_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv)
return 0;
}
-/* v1.x: msm8956,8976,qcs404,405 */
+static int calibrate_8994(struct tsens_priv *priv)
+{
+ int base0 = 0, base1 = 0, i;
+ u32 p[16] = { [0 ... 15] = 532 }; /* HW-specific, undocumented magic value */

Maybe make 532 into a #define ?

+ int mode = 0;
+ u32 *calib0, *calib1, *calib2, *calib_mode, *calib_rsel;
+ u32 calib_redun_sel;
+
+ /* 0x40d0-0x40dc */
+ calib0 = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");
+ if (IS_ERR(calib0))
+ return PTR_ERR(calib0);
+
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib0: [0] = %u, [1] = %u, [2] = %u\n",
+ __func__, calib0[0], calib0[1], calib0[2]);
+
+ /* 0x41c0-0x41c8 */
+ calib1 = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_redun1_2");
+ if (IS_ERR(calib1))
+ return PTR_ERR(calib1);
+
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib1: [0] = %u, [1] = %u\n",
+ __func__, calib1[0], calib1[1]);
+
+ /* 0x41cc-0x41d0 */
+ calib2 = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_redun3");
+ if (IS_ERR(calib2))
+ return PTR_ERR(calib2);
+
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib2: [0] = %u\n", __func__, calib2[0]);
+
+ /* 0x4440-0x4448 */
+ calib_mode = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_redun4_5");
+ if (IS_ERR(calib_mode))
+ return PTR_ERR(calib_mode);
+
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib_mode: [0] = %u, [1] = %u\n",
+ __func__, calib1[0], calib1[1]);
+
+ /* 0x4464-0x4468 */
+ calib_rsel = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_rsel");
+ if (IS_ERR(calib_mode))
+ return PTR_ERR(calib_mode);
+
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib_rsel: [0] = %u\n", __func__, calib_rsel[0]);
+
+ calib_redun_sel = calib_rsel[0] & MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_MASK;
+ calib_redun_sel >>= MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_SHIFT;

Again please look at combining the above into one line.

+
+ if (calib_redun_sel == BKP_SEL) {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: Calibrating in REDUN mode, calib_redun_sel = %u",
+ __func__, calib_redun_sel);
+ mode = calib_mode[1] & MSM8994_REDUN_SEL_MASK;
+
+ if (mode == TWO_PT_CALIB) {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: REDUN TWO_PT mode, mode = %u", __func__, mode);
+ base0 = (calib1[0] & MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ base1 = (calib1[0] & MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_SHIFT_COMPUTE;
+ base1 |= calib1[1] & MSM8994_BASE1_BIT1_9_REDUN_MASK;
+ p[0] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S0_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S0_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[1] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S1_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S1_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[2] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S2_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S2_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[3] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S3_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S3_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[4] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S4_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S4_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[5] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT0_2) >> MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT0_2;
+ p[5] |= (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT3) >> MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT3;
+ p[6] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S6_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S6_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[7] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S7_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S7_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[8] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S8_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S8_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[9] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S9_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S9_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[10] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S10_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S10_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[11] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S11_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S11_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[12] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S12_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S12_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[13] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S13_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S13_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[14] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S14_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S14_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ p[15] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S15_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S15_REDUN_SHIFT;
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: REDUN NON-TWO_PT mode, mode = %u", __func__, mode);
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: Calibrating in NOT-REDUN mode, calib_redun_sel = %u",
+ __func__, calib_redun_sel);
+ mode = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8994_CAL_SEL_SHIFT;
+
+ if (mode == TWO_PT_CALIB) {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: NOT-REDUN TWO_PT mode, mode = %u", __func__, mode);
+ base0 = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_BASE0_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE0_SHIFT;
+ base1 = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE1_SHIFT;
+ p[0] = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_S0_MASK) >> MSM8994_S0_SHIFT;
+ p[1] = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_S1_MASK) >> MSM8994_S1_SHIFT;
+ p[2] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S2_MASK) >> MSM8994_S2_SHIFT;
+ p[3] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S3_MASK) >> MSM8994_S3_SHIFT;
+ p[4] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S4_MASK) >> MSM8994_S4_SHIFT;
+ p[5] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S5_MASK) >> MSM8994_S5_SHIFT;
+ p[6] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S6_MASK) >> MSM8994_S6_SHIFT;
+ p[7] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S7_MASK) >> MSM8994_S7_SHIFT;
+ p[8] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S8_MASK) >> MSM8994_S8_SHIFT;
+ p[9] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S9_MASK) >> MSM8994_S9_SHIFT;
+ p[10] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S10_MASK) >> MSM8994_S10_SHIFT;
+ p[11] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S11_MASK) >> MSM8994_S11_SHIFT;
+ p[12] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S12_MASK) >> MSM8994_S12_SHIFT;
+ p[13] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S13_MASK) >> MSM8994_S13_SHIFT;
+ p[14] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S14_MASK) >> MSM8994_S14_SHIFT;
+ p[15] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S15_MASK) >> MSM8994_S15_SHIFT;
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: NOT-REDUN NON-TWO_PT mode, mode = %u", __func__, mode);
+ for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
+ p[i] = 532;

You can drop the loop, right? Because you have initialized it above.

+ }
+ }
+
+ /* 8992 features less sensors and remaps some */
+ if (priv->num_sensors == 13) {

I don't really like this check. But then there is no other way in tsens_priv to distinguish btw 8992 and 8994. So let us leave it as is.

+ p[6] = p[7];
+ p[7] = p[9];
+ p[8] = p[10];
+ p[9] = p[11];
+ p[10] = p[12];
+ p[11] = p[13];
+ p[12] = p[14];
+ }
+
+ compute_intercept_slope_8994(priv, base0, base1, p, mode);
+ kfree(calib0);
+ kfree(calib1);
+ kfree(calib2);
+ kfree(calib_mode);

free calib_rsel ??

+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* v1.x: msm8956/8976, msm8994 (v1.2), qcs404/qcs405 */
static struct tsens_features tsens_v1_feat = {
.ver_major = VER_1_X,
.crit_int = 0,
.adc = 1,
.srot_split = 1,
- .max_sensors = 11,
+ .max_sensors = 16,
};
static const struct reg_field tsens_v1_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
@@ -323,12 +570,12 @@ static const struct reg_field tsens_v1_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
[INT_EN] = REG_FIELD(TM_INT_EN_OFF, 0, 0),
/* UPPER/LOWER TEMPERATURE THRESHOLDS */
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LOW_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 0, 9),
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(UP_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 10, 19),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LOW_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 0, 9),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(UP_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 10, 19),
/* UPPER/LOWER INTERRUPTS [CLEAR/STATUS] */
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LOW_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 20, 20),
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(UP_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 21, 21),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LOW_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 20, 20),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(UP_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 21, 21),
[LOW_INT_STATUS_0] = REG_FIELD(TM_HIGH_LOW_INT_STATUS_OFF, 0, 0),
[LOW_INT_STATUS_1] = REG_FIELD(TM_HIGH_LOW_INT_STATUS_OFF, 1, 1),
[LOW_INT_STATUS_2] = REG_FIELD(TM_HIGH_LOW_INT_STATUS_OFF, 2, 2),
@@ -349,14 +596,14 @@ static const struct reg_field tsens_v1_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
/* NO CRITICAL INTERRUPT SUPPORT on v1 */
/* Sn_STATUS */
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LAST_TEMP, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 0, 9),
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(VALID, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 14, 14),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LAST_TEMP, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 0, 9),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(VALID, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 14, 14),
/* xxx_STATUS bits: 1 == threshold violated */
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(MIN_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 10, 10),
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LOWER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 11, 11),
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(UPPER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 12, 12),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(MIN_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 10, 10),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LOWER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 11, 11),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(UPPER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 12, 12),
/* No CRITICAL field on v1.x */
- REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(MAX_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 13, 13),
+ REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(MAX_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 13, 13),
/* TRDY: 1=ready, 0=in progress */
[TRDY] = REG_FIELD(TM_TRDY_OFF, 0, 0),
@@ -388,3 +635,31 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8976 = {
.feat = &tsens_v1_feat,
.fields = tsens_v1_regfields,
};
+
+static const struct tsens_ops ops_8992 = {
+ .init = init_common,
+ .calibrate = calibrate_8994,
+ .get_temp = get_temp_tsens_valid,
+};
+
+struct tsens_plat_data data_8992 = {
+ .num_sensors = 13,
+ .ops = &ops_8992,
+ .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 },
+ .feat = &tsens_v1_feat,
+ .fields = tsens_v1_regfields,
+};
+
+static const struct tsens_ops ops_8994 = {
+ .init = init_common,
+ .calibrate = calibrate_8994,
+ .get_temp = get_temp_tsens_valid,
+};

Please use one common tsens_ops for 8994 and 8992.

+
+struct tsens_plat_data data_8994 = {
+ .num_sensors = 16,
+ .ops = &ops_8994,
+ .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 },
+ .feat = &tsens_v1_feat,
+ .fields = tsens_v1_regfields,
+};
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
index 4c7ebd1d3f9c..c3cd4425bbfd 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
@@ -982,6 +982,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = {
}, {
.compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens",
.data = &data_8974,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "qcom,msm8992-tsens",
+ .data = &data_8992,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "qcom,msm8994-tsens",
+ .data = &data_8994,
}, {
.compatible = "qcom,msm8976-tsens",
.data = &data_8976,
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
index 1471a2c00f15..ca2b0ac914c1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960;
extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8939, data_8974, data_9607;
/* TSENS v1 targets */
-extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976;
+extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976, data_8992, data_8994;
/* TSENS v2 targets */
extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8996, data_tsens_v2;

--
Warm Regards
Thara (She/Her/Hers)

Next message: Matti Vaittinen: "Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: omap-prm: Fix external abort for am335x pruss"
Previous message: Zhu Yanjun: "Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] Providers/rxe: Add dma-buf support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]