Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Convert to YAML bindings

[Viresh Kumar]

On 04-10-21, 10:01, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> If you wrote the patch, then Angelo handled it, then you handled it
> again the double S-o-b captures that nicely.
> 
> Looking it from the other angle, if you remove the first S-o-b, then you
> forgot to signed it off when you authored the original patch and if you
> skip the last S-o-b then you didn't adequately sign off the final
> result.

Hmm, interesting that it can be looked this way. I am wondering if
between 10 different versions two people ping pong the ownership of
the patch, then will we need to capture 5-5 signed-off-by's from each
of them :)

>From my understanding, that I had until now, the list of tags specify
who all performed what different roles in the patch
development/submission and when did that happen (sort of timeline), so
last tag is added by the new handler of the patch. But adding two
signed-off-by's by a single guy looks fishy, though it may actually be
correct :)

-- 
viresh