Re: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: use id_alt to enumerate rt5682s

[Curtis Malainey]

>  };
>
> +static struct snd_soc_acpi_codecs adl_rt5682s_hp = {
> +       .num_codecs = 1,
> +       .codecs = {"RTL5682"}
> +};
> +
>  struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
>         {
>                 .id = "10EC5682",
> +               .id_alt = &adl_rt5682s_hp,
>                 .drv_name = "adl_mx98373_rt5682",
>                 .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
>                 .quirk_data = &adl_max98373_amp,
> @@ -296,6 +302,7 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
>         },
>         {
>                 .id = "10EC5682",
> +               .id_alt = &adl_rt5682s_hp,
>                 .drv_name = "adl_mx98357_rt5682",
>                 .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
>                 .quirk_data = &adl_max98357a_amp,
> @@ -304,6 +311,7 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
>         },
>         {
>                 .id = "10EC5682",
> +               .id_alt = &adl_rt5682s_hp,
>                 .drv_name = "adl_mx98360_rt5682",
>                 .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
>                 .quirk_data = &adl_max98360a_amp,

Is there any way we can collapse this and the primary id into a single
list to avoid having 2 locations to track for the IDs?