Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] media: ti: Add CSI2RX support for J721E

From: Pratyush Yadav
Date: Wed Oct 06 2021 - 17:01:54 EST


On 06/10/21 11:28PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Pratyush,
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 05:32:37PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> ...
> > +/*
> > + * Find the input format. This is done by finding the first device in the
> > + * pipeline which can tell us the current format. This could be the sensor, or
> > + * this could be another device in the middle which is capable of format
> > + * conversions.
> > + */
> > +static int ti_csi2rx_validate_pipeline(struct ti_csi2rx_dev *csi)
> > +{
> > + struct media_pipeline *pipe = &csi->pipe;
> > + struct media_entity *entity;
> > + struct v4l2_subdev *sd;
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_format fmt;
> > + struct v4l2_pix_format *pix = &csi->v_fmt.fmt.pix;
> > + struct media_device *mdev = &csi->mdev;
> > + const struct ti_csi2rx_fmt *ti_fmt;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> > + ret = media_graph_walk_init(&pipe->graph, mdev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + media_graph_walk_start(&pipe->graph, &csi->vdev.entity);
> > +
> > + while ((entity = media_graph_walk_next(&pipe->graph))) {
> > + if (!is_media_entity_v4l2_subdev(entity))
> > + continue;
>
> You shouldn't rely on media_graph_walk_next() to return entities in a
> particular order.

Ah, right. Need to drop this.

>
> I'd suggest approach taken in isp_video_check_external_subdevs() (in
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispvideo.c).
>
> > +
> > + sd = media_entity_to_v4l2_subdev(entity);
> > +
> > + fmt.which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE;
> > + fmt.pad = media_get_pad_index(entity, 0, PAD_SIGNAL_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, pad, get_fmt, NULL, &fmt);
> > + if (ret && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD) {
> > + media_graph_walk_cleanup(&pipe->graph);
> > + mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!ret)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + media_graph_walk_cleanup(&pipe->graph);
> > + mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> > +
> > + /* Could not find input format. */
> > + if (!entity)
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > +
> > + if (fmt.format.width != pix->width)
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > + if (fmt.format.height != pix->height)
> > + return -EPIPE;
>
> Pipeline validation should take place during media_pipeline_start(). Why
> are you doing it here?

How would be do that? Via the link_validate callback?

>
> > +
> > + ti_fmt = find_format_by_pix(pix->pixelformat);
> > + if (WARN_ON(!ti_fmt))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (fmt.format.code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV8_2X8 ||
> > + fmt.format.code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_VYUY8_2X8 ||
> > + fmt.format.code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YVYU8_2X8) {
> > + dev_err(csi->dev,
> > + "Only UYVY input allowed for YUV422 8-bit. Output format can be configured.\n");
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (fmt.format.code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_2X8) {
> > + /* Format conversion between YUV422 formats can be done. */
> > + if (ti_fmt->code != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_UYVY8_2X8 &&
> > + ti_fmt->code != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUYV8_2X8 &&
> > + ti_fmt->code != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_VYUY8_2X8 &&
> > + ti_fmt->code != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YVYU8_2X8)
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > + } else if (fmt.format.code != ti_fmt->code) {
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (fmt.format.field != V4L2_FIELD_NONE &&
> > + fmt.format.field != V4L2_FIELD_ANY)
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ti_csi2rx_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count)
> > +{
> > + struct ti_csi2rx_dev *csi = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> > + struct ti_csi2rx_dma *dma = &csi->dma;
> > + struct ti_csi2rx_buffer *buf, *tmp;
> > + unsigned long flags = 0;
>
> No need to assign flags here.

Ok.

>
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus

--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.