Re: [PATCH 4/9] x86/alternative: Implement .retpoline_sites support

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Oct 15 2021 - 10:24:13 EST


On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:22:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static int patch_retpoline(void *addr, struct insn *insn, u8 *bytes)
> +{
> + void (*target)(void);
> + int reg, i = 0;
> +
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE))
> + return -1;
> +
> + target = addr + insn->length + insn->immediate.value;
> + reg = (target - &__x86_indirect_thunk_rax) /
> + (&__x86_indirect_thunk_rcx - &__x86_indirect_thunk_rax);

I guess you should compute those values once so that it doesn't have to
do them for each function invocation. And it does them here when I look
at the asm it generates.

> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg & ~0xf))
> + return -1;

Sanity-checking the alignment of those thunks?

> +
> + i = emit_indirect(insn->opcode.bytes[0], reg, bytes);
> + if (i < 0)
> + return i;
> +
> + for (; i < insn->length;)
> + bytes[i++] = BYTES_NOP1;

Why not:

nop_len = insn->length - i;
if (nop_len) {
memcpy(&bytes[i], x86_nops[nop_len], nop_len);
i += nop_len;
}

and then you save yourself the optimize_nops() call because it'll take
the right-sized NOP directly.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette